User talk:Sandstein: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎AE appeal: new section
Line 28: Line 28:
== Deletion review for [[Ruth Koleva]] ==
== Deletion review for [[Ruth Koleva]] ==
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Ruth Koleva|deletion review]] of [[Ruth Koleva]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> [[User:Quickfingers|Quickfingers]] ([[User talk:Quickfingers|talk]]) 01:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Ruth Koleva|deletion review]] of [[Ruth Koleva]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> [[User:Quickfingers|Quickfingers]] ([[User talk:Quickfingers|talk]]) 01:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

== AE appeal ==

For your information: on the request of Roscelese I have filed an appeal for them: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Roscelese]]. --[[User:MrClog|MrClog]] ([[User talk:MrClog|talk]]) 18:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:20, 10 June 2019

Welcome to my talk page!

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or click here to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless you request otherwise. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:

  • Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. This will create an identifying signature and timestamp.
  • If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on administrative duty, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]].
  • If you are looking for my talk page's previous contents, they are in the archives.


Start a new talk topic

June 2019

Information iconHello, Sandstein, I saw that you made a draft for a new article at User:Sandstein/Ava's Demon. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). Is there anything in your draft that could be merged into Ava's Demon? GretLomborg (talk) 06:35, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've deleted the draft because I don't think I'll finish it. Sandstein 08:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup

On 8 June 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of arbitration

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 23, 2019, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, – bradv🍁 15:07, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering the explanation as to why this was a no consensus, as your close was brief and as none of the keep voters really demonstrated WP:GNG IMO. SportingFlyer T·C 18:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's a reasonable view to take. But there was also no consensus that the topic failed notability. In such cases, editors often disagree in good faith about how much and which quality of sourcing is required, and I can't decide this by fiat. Sandstein 09:46, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Ruth Koleva

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ruth Koleva. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Quickfingers (talk) 01:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AE appeal

For your information: on the request of Roscelese I have filed an appeal for them: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Roscelese. --MrClog (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]