User talk:Sennalen: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:36, 30 December 2021

CLEANSTART account?

Is this a WP:CLEANSTART account? I have the impression that you have edited in this topic area before. Newimpartial (talk) 20:05, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have not edited under any name for a year at least. I've edited in many controversial topics. Sennalen (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Were you eligible for a clean start? No relevant sanctions, etc.? Newimpartial (talk) 20:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I stopped only for lack of time. Sennalen (talk) 20:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How long has it been since you edited Marxist cultural analysis, Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, or one of their Talk pages? Newimpartial (talk) 20:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently, more than five years ago. Sennalen (talk) 20:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sennalen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sennalen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Standard ArbCom sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 15:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 |}
 [[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation]]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation -->
+== Standard ArbCom sanctions notice  ==
+{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text  = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
+You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.
+For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
+}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Newimpartial|Newimpartial]] ([[User talk:Newimpartial|talk]]) 15:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)