User talk:Skäpperöd

Welcome! You can navigate through earlier posts on this page via this page's history. Add a new section I will respond here.

Contents

DYK for Swedish Wars on Bremen

On December 22, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Swedish Wars on Bremen, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Gustavia, Rügen

On December 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gustavia, Rügen, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Vorpommern

Mea culpa. Lfh (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Could you check the stress at Saarbrücken too? It was placed on two syllables, so I removed the second, but maybe I should have removed the first. Lfh (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Expulsion of Germans after World War II

I have soft-protected Expulsion of Germans after World War II to allow for more discussion on the talk page before further large changes are made to the article. This allows for established users to edit the page, but not anonymous IPs, so that this does not become an edit war. Cheers --BaronLarf 19:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Relax

I did not call anybody a Neo-Nazi. You have no cause for complaint.--Woogie10w (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Ok, why keep him there? The mention of the IHR stinks like a dead fish in the sun.--Woogie10w (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Note well my earlier comments The current article is poorly written and sorely needs a lot of cleanup work. Over the years this article has become a hodgepodge of edits by editors who acted in good faith but unfortunately lack historical expertise. Overall my POV is sympathetic to the plight of the German civilian population who became the victims of the expulsions. The historical facts need to be narrated in a credible scholarly article rather than the current disjointed, poorly written mess that exists at this time--Woogie10w (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

The article is your baby, let me read the The New Cambridge Medieval History[1]--Woogie10w (talk) 23:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Happy Skäpperöd's Day!

User:Skäpperöd has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Skäpperöd's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Skäpperöd! Peace, Rlevse 00:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC) A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Humph! He completely misled me with his photos of unblemished hollyhocks. Shameful. Novickas (talk) 03:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! You made my snowed-in day! Skäpperöd (talk) 09:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Brotbackautomat.

Wir haben frisches Brot, Schnee oder kein Schnee. Wir Haben ein Brotbackautomat. [2]--Woogie10w (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Ecktes Brot

Weizenmehl-2 tassen(US)

Vollkornweizenmehl-1/4 tasse (US)

Roggenmehl-1/4 tasse (US)

Milchpulver- 1 tablespoon (15 milliliters)

Olivenöl 1 tablespoon (15 milliliters)

Salz-1 teaspoon (5 milliliters)

brauner Zucker-2 tablespoons (30 milliliters)

Wasser-1 tasse (US)

Backhefe-1 teaspoon 5 (milliliters)

backen vier Stunden--Woogie10w (talk) 21:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Resolved

Malik Shabazz undid his action.

Tylman AfD

Your editorial comments are unhelpful, unnecessary, and serve no purpose other than to create a hostile atmosphere. If User:Paweł5586 should not have commented, let the blocking admin remove his comment. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop trying to turn this AfD into a battleground. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 07:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

(response)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK for Peace of Travendal

On January 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peace of Travendal, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

History of Poland

There are missing references because I haven't finished this big "Decline of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" section yet. I get most of the development from the "Historia Polski 1505-1764" book by Gierowski, it's listed there, an old Jagiellonian University text. Then I check some other sources, add information, do references. This process is basically complete as far as I'm concerned up to the "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" portion, so any corrections, additions, additional references would be best to put into this "finished" part. This current "Decline" part it is probably best to leave till I'm done with it. Other that that I appreciate contributions and involvement. For example I rarely add internet references, which I suppose should become increasingly available as the network encompasses more and more things. Thank for your interest and constructive input. Orczar (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Tylman AfD

I'm relieved to hear you didn't take offense. Looking back, I realized that I made my comment right after you, and I used the word "you". Thanks. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Siege of Stralsund (1711–1715)

On January 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Stralsund (1711–1715), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Siege of Tönning

On January 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Tönning, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Poznań

Hi Skapperod, I would appreciate if you would stop POV pushing on Polish cities. Thank you.  Dr. Loosmark  22:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

?Skäpperöd (talk) 22:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

You know very well what I mean. I request you give us a quote of the relevant text from the source on the article's talk page.  Dr. Loosmark  00:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

[3] Skäpperöd (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

How does "Also in Poland and Bohemia were the burghers in the towns initially primarily of German origin" support your claim that the "German settlers constituted the majority in Polish towns of that time"!? Please remove your nonsensical claim.  Dr. Loosmark  12:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Maybe my translation is slightly ambiguous (though I don't think so), but I had also quoted the original. "Überwiegend", which I translated as "primarily", means primarily in the sense of constituting a majority, but "primarily of German origin" and "German majority" are imho redundant anyways. Please also avoid aggressive terms like "POV pushing" and "nonsensical claim" when talking to me. Skäpperöd (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Initially (soon after the Mongol invasion - at a single point in time) primarily of German origin is quite different from "constituted a majority of Polish towns at that time". Please stop pushing your POV.  Dr. Loosmark  18:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

No, "initially" refers to the Ostsiedlung = founding period of these towns, I wonder why you associate the Mongols with that quote? Sure that was the same time period, and there was a feedback-loop on Ostsiedlung, but that was primarily in Lesser Poland and Silesia. Anyhow, the paragraph from which the quote is derived does not mention the Mongols, it deals exclusively with the founding of towns during the Ostsiedlung. I am sorry to see that you won't tone down your aggressive language. Skäpperöd (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Two things 1) These towns = which towns? 2) What exactly is meant by "founding period"? I hope you are not claiming that these towns had a German majority at the time where they were founded. PS please don't make bogus accusations of aggressive language.  Dr. Loosmark  10:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

The Cambridge History of Poland Vol 1 supports Skäpperöd's POV--Woogie10w (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Arbeiterbewegung in Pommern

Maybe you are interested in this [4] [5]. Viele Grüße HerkusMonte (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, I just skimmed through it and will look at it more closely as time permits. Skäpperöd (talk) 19:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thx

Thanks for improving my articles. My writting english is not good but I am trying my best (Meost (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC))

Wikiout

WuhWuzDat 17:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

RSOE EDIS

Hi Skäpperöd. I see you noticed my decline of your speedy tagging on RSOE EDIS - I would have notified you but you got there first. After looking over the article a bit in the process of trying to find sources I decided it qualifies as unambiguous promotion and deleted it anyway. Cheers, Olaf Davis (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lorenz Schwietz

On February 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lorenz Schwietz, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of German-Japanese relations

Hi there. Over the past weeks I majorly expanded the article on German-Japanese relations and really need people to go scan my contributions. I want to set a high quality standard since I'd love to have it featured some day. I'd really appreciate your participation on its nomination for a Good Article at Talk:German–Japanese relations. Thanks in advance! --Gliese876 (talk) 11:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Europa regina

On February 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Europa regina, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)