User talk:Smsarmad: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dhruv2357 (talk | contribs)
→‎Impartiality: new section
Line 112: Line 112:
:You need to discuss this at the relevant talk page (that in this case is [[Talk:Saraiki dialect]]) with the editors who don't agree with you, instead of edit warring, as this is going to achieve you nothing except a block. -- [[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 11:52, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
:You need to discuss this at the relevant talk page (that in this case is [[Talk:Saraiki dialect]]) with the editors who don't agree with you, instead of edit warring, as this is going to achieve you nothing except a block. -- [[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 11:52, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
:And as I already told you please read the [[WP:SOCKING|Wikipedia's Sock puppetry Policy]]. -- [[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 11:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
:And as I already told you please read the [[WP:SOCKING|Wikipedia's Sock puppetry Policy]]. -- [[User:Smsarmad|<span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span><span style="background:white;color:DodgerBlue">'''M'''</span><span style="background:white;color:LightSeaGreen">'''S'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Smsarmad|Talk]]</sup> 11:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

== Impartiality ==

Hello, brother I am sorry to say that what you are doing is appearing more than partial. To be a wikipedia editor you need to be aware of General Knowledge which you seem not to be or even if you are you are manuplulating it. Read CIA & RAW reports. They have clearly investigated & stated Laskar-E-Taiba is funded & protected by ISI (Pakistani Secret Agency). I believe you know ALL of these but you are just trying to be too much innocent. Anyways, you are the reviwer & I am not. Be it whatever you are I have no power to overrule your decision. Have a good day.

Revision as of 02:49, 7 October 2013

Home Talk Contributions Sandbox Email Tool Box

Home

Talk

Contributions

Sandbox

Email

Toolbox

Edit Count

WELCOME ON MY TALK PAGE!
Leave me message·My archive




HOW'S MY EDITING?
Please review me!

Template:Archive box collapsible

URGENT CONTACT

Dear Mr. SmSarmad

You have made some edits/ changes to an article Javed Malik. We need to update you on a few things as some of the details are not correct and we tried to correct them, and you have UNDONE the edits and restored the old article.

I am not a professional Wiki editor. I am working for Mr. Javed Malik's friend and we are just trying to make the article accurate with some details, and also add an image, but it seems that some wiki editors keep deleting our changes.

We would appreciate if you can please contact me, so that we can make this article with your kind help.

I am not fimiliar with wiki talk pages, etc........ can you please reply by e mail on

SandraRoberts21@gmail.com and can i have your e-mail ID


Many thanks, and waiting for your reply


Sandra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameszapper (talkcontribs) 23:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've been editing on WP since 2006, and you're still not familiar with talk pages? --| Uncle Milty | talk | 23:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry I don't prefer to talk off-wiki on this issue unless there is a need to do that but I don't find such a situation in this case. I suggest you share whatever you want to say here. Besides if you can point explicitly what information at Javed Malik article is incorrect, I may be able to help you. Thanks --SMS Talk 17:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Familiarize yourself with Arbitration Committee Discretionary Sanctions, please.

Hi, SMSarmad. I just wanted to remind you that discretionary sanctions may be taken by Arbitration Committee for India-Pakistan related articles. Instead of engaging in revert wars, I suggest that you bring any issues you might have to Talk:Partition of India. Adding different points of view with citations or asking for citations for content you personally disagree with is most welcome. I noticed that most, if not all, of your edits on Partition of India are major reverts. It would be great if you added content instead of discouraging other editors from contributing meaningfully. Please familiarize yourself well with Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/India-Pakistan. :) --Bookishness (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Bookishness (talkcontribs) is a confirmed sockpuppet of Crème3.14159 (talkcontribs). --SMS Talk 13:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious sock of peepie/creampie. Wonder were he is editing from so he could avoid CU. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you guys saw through him pretty quickly! The secret service should be employing you. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And your patience is admirable when dealing with such problematic editors. --SMS Talk 16:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Bahria University

who the hell are you boy? y u always revert my changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohsin.khan92 (talkcontribs) 18:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am an editor here just like you. I have already explained each of my revert in the edit summaries and messages at your talk page, but I will do it again. So far I have reverted two of your edits and both because they violated Wikipedia's Copyrights Policy. You can't just copy content from any where and paste it here specially when it is copyright protected as is the case with content you copied to this article. I suggest you read this policy for a better understanding of why your changes were reverted. And persistently adding copyrighted content without due permission can get you blocked, besides you may also like to read Wikipedia's Socking Policy, because I suppose it was you who restored that content while logged out. Happy Editing! --SMS Talk 20:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Noureed Awan - which version should stand?

You have recently edited Malik Noureed Awan. Please see Talk:Malik Noureed Awan#Call for reasons why the NPOV/poorly-referenced version should stand and contribute your thoughts. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:06, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

editing living person etc.

Are you an official editor with Wikipedia? why is it that you are responsible for the content of pakistan military related pages? he was a B category pilot (no efficiency wing on his uniform) and he flew less than a bloody Wing Commander would because he was a coward (blue wing) which he controversially changed to red when he was appoint CAS. see his picture when he was meeting Musharraf, blue wing. also this link http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_20-3-2003_pg1_5 One of the biggest disgracers to not only serve but make it to the top at the expense of competently more professional pilots and commanders. Also he rented out his f-8 house to SAAB whom the Air Force has a billion dollar deal with. Google that and you will have your references. have a good day 115.186.137.234 (talk) 07:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no official/unofficial editor thing at Wikipedia. Every editor works here as a volunteer and has every right to edit any article while following Wikipedia's Policies and Guidlines. Now about the article concerned, whatever information you are adding is unsourced and highly controversial, thus violating Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. And I have already checked and I am unable to find a single reliable source that supports the content you want to be added to this article. So I suggest you avoid violating Wikipedia's key content policies by adding such controversial information without a reliable source. --SMS Talk 17:14, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
where have you checked for a reliable source? I have already pasted a dailytimes link that shows his uniform also google SAAB with his name next to it? and one more thing. GO F**K YOURSELF!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.65.148.9 (talk) 15:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does the image say that wearing a blue flying badge categorizes you as a B-category pilot? No. Its your personal knowledge and that too a concocted one. These badges (white, blue, red) only depict the flying hours one has completed. And about the SAAB induction read Wikipedia's Reliable Source Guideline for having a better understanding what a "reliable source" means. -- SMS Talk 15:51, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid User

Excuse me Smsarmad , WHAT IS PROBLEM WITH YOU??? (Abusing). You Edit my many articles that I made. You have no any work besiding changing the articles. But dont worry, i have send a report to wikipedia policy. Enough is Enough, if try one more time, wikipedia will block your account and yout IP address will not edit the articles. I give you a title Stupid User. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai98.express (talkcontribs) 16:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I won't respond to your personal attacks but would like to advise you to divert your efforts to the List of festivals in Pakistan instead of creating duplicate articles. Besides there is no my or your article, no one here owns the article they edit/create. --SMS Talk 16:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And please acquaint yourself with Wikipedia's Socking policy. I suggest you should make an unblock request from your master account instead of evading your block by creating new accounts. --SMS Talk 16:43, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia: Reporting Policy

Hello Smsarmad, A notice received from a wikipedia user Chennai98.express. He/She gave a report that you had tried to revert the articles made by him/her. The user Request wikipedia to block you from editing and note your IP address. But wikipedia giving you a warning

Chennai98.express gave an issue that article List of Festivals in Pakistan is the list of Pakistani Festivals for every year. But Pakistan National Events (Yearwise) is the list for different years.

Thanks, Wikipedia Reporting Policy

— Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiReportingPolicy (talkcontribs) 17:21, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nicely formatted warning but I feel sorry for your incompetence or inability of understanding the issue at hand. --SMS Talk 17:25, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhhh..... Yes! Thank God that Wikipedia forbade you to reverting my changes. I think you will understood the issue of Festivals of Pakist6an Process — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennai98.express (talkcontribs) 17:30, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please consider this

hello. you only gave edit.war warning to me not to the other user:BilCat. so answer me? warring is between two sides. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajaomair (talkcontribs) 15:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BilCat is an experienced editor and I don't need to write him/her a message/warning about the Edit Warring policy before reporting him/her for any such violation. I have plenty of evidence that he/she is aware of this policy. The message I left at your talk page was to educate you about this policy and possible consequence in case you violate it. Now I see BilCat did participate in the edit war but didn't do more than two reverts. But you even after that message continued reverting. And the report I have filed at the Edit Warring Noticeboard is for violation of 3RR rule besides edit warring and any admin who will review it will also look into the behavior of the other party involved. I still suggest you read the edit warring page already linked above and in my message at your talk and see how can you escape a possible administrative action. -- SMS Talk 15:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Khan edit

I edited imran khan birthay and its not incorrect, it s from an authentic source. In the recent biography published by Christopher Sandford,it's said that Imran Khan was born on the 5th of october. Not 25th November. Whereas,on the net it's mentioned it to be on the 25h November. It explains that "when he came to obtain his first passport,resulting in an official filling in the wrong date — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustafa arif021 (talkcontribs) 22:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented at the article's talk page, kindly discuss it further there. Besides please provide a quote from the book and page number if you have access to this book. -- SMS Talk 10:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fairy Meadows

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

saraiki language

Dear sarmad Saraiki is a language also, Kindly look into matter, Do the same on merit.182.186.32.76 (talk) 11:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You need to discuss this at the relevant talk page (that in this case is Talk:Saraiki dialect) with the editors who don't agree with you, instead of edit warring, as this is going to achieve you nothing except a block. -- SMS Talk 11:52, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And as I already told you please read the Wikipedia's Sock puppetry Policy. -- SMS Talk 11:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Impartiality

Hello, brother I am sorry to say that what you are doing is appearing more than partial. To be a wikipedia editor you need to be aware of General Knowledge which you seem not to be or even if you are you are manuplulating it. Read CIA & RAW reports. They have clearly investigated & stated Laskar-E-Taiba is funded & protected by ISI (Pakistani Secret Agency). I believe you know ALL of these but you are just trying to be too much innocent. Anyways, you are the reviwer & I am not. Be it whatever you are I have no power to overrule your decision. Have a good day.