User talk:Spirit of Eagle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 125.167.115.222 (talk) at 05:17, 10 November 2020 (→‎Thank you. It's very kind of you, I'll consider it…: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Nom of Bonanza City, New Mexico

I was looking through the GAN page and noticed this article was still stub-class. Per Wikipedia:Good article criteria#What cannot be a good article?, stubs cannot be GAs. I think it's a jerk move for reviewers to quick fail articles where a lot of work has been put it just because the article's a stub. I recommend that you get the article reclassed, so that it can make the cut. It looks like you've put a lot of good work into that page. Hope the reclassifying process goes well! Hog Farm (talk) 02:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! I'll post a request to re-class shortly. I would hope that the reviewing editor would have enough sense not to quick fail the article because of the class it had before my expansion, but it's always good to eliminate potential stumbling blocks when you get the opportunity. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bonanza City, New Mexico

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bonanza City, New Mexico you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 04:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bonanza City, New Mexico

The article Bonanza City, New Mexico you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bonanza City, New Mexico for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 05:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bonanza City, New Mexico

The article Bonanza City, New Mexico you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bonanza City, New Mexico for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 04:21, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bonanza City, New Mexico

On 9 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bonanza City, New Mexico, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bonanza City, New Mexico, was founded in 1880 and largely abandoned by 1890? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bonanza City, New Mexico. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bonanza City, New Mexico), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yupik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Containment breach

Hello! Since you, afaict, are the WP:SHEPHERD of SCP, I'm commenting here.

I did this edit [1] because IMO, WP pop-cult stuff should have a decent secondary source, existing is not enough (and it was a little WP:PUFFERY). Then I searched for www.scp-wiki.net on WP and got a few hits. I removed a few, but in crappy articles like Per aspera ad astra and True name SCP isn't any worse than much else of the content. I may look into improving Per aspera ad astra at some point.

So, nothing you've done or should do, but perhaps a little interesting. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have my blessings for this. I'm obviously partial to the SCP Foundation, but "In Popular Culture" lists cited solely to the creative work the article topic appears in are (in my opinion) inappropriate. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's very kind of you, I'll consider it…

…but for the mean time, I'll stay IP. Again, thanks!

125.167.115.222 (talk) 05:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: This is my incognito address, NOT MY PERSONAL IP. IT WILL HOP TO ANOTHER ADRESS)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spirit_of_Eagle&oldid=987949653"