User talk:Sugeeth Jayaraj

Sugeeth Jayaraj, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sugeeth Jayaraj! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Girdawary moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Girdawary, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 16:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Girdawary

Hello, Sugeeth Jayaraj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Girdawary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cotyledonosis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cotyledonosis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/21/3/348. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 06:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quite apart from being copyvios, the above article and krimpsiekte were academic papers not Wikipedia articles. If you think these subjects are notable, you must take the time to write proper encyclopedia articles. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I am not a fully experienced person in creating articles, This is just my third article on Wikipedia. Please forgive me if it is wrong to copy from other web pages. Thanks for warning me about it and please delete that article. Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 09:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Girdawary concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Girdawary, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Electric charge

I have reverted your goodwill edits to the article about Electric charge because:

Your edits described charge to be a "basic property", which is not as accurate as describing charge to be a "physical property".
It claimed charge to be a "basic property of electrons, protons and other subatomic particles", which is not incorrect, but it does not conclude that charge can be possessed by objects as a whole.
It used the phrase "Law of Charges", which is apparently a paraphrase used to refer to Coulomb's law, but your text treats "Law of Charges" to be different from Coulomb's law.
The text about neutrality was removed.
It provided repetitive description of the properties of matter exhibiting positive and negative charge.

If you think that the aforementioned points do not justify my edits, please let me know. Ambuj Shukla 09:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambujshukla2004 (talk • contribs)