You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for chronic edit-warring, personal attacks, and obnoxious edit summaries. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I'm sorry. Please give me a second chance and unblock me. Thank you.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts (as in, today.) --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:30, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I'm sorry for the constant block evading that went on for over a month, and lied about it. If unblocked, I could make a few grammar corrections to pages that might have some errors. I'm only here cause I like to edit articles about TV.
Decline reason:
The best you're likely to be given is the standard offer. In short: don't make any more accounts, wait six months or more, then come back and request unblocking. —DoRD (talk) 18:37, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'm sorry for the constant block evading that went on for over a month, and lied about it. If unblocked, I could make a few grammar corrections to pages that might have some errors. I'm only here cause I like to edit articles about TV. I also want my community ban uplifted and this constant semi-protection garbage to end. And for the record, I did not edit pages like WRC-TV, KOMU-TV, and KTBC, among a few others, and I never used 50.26.125.175 to sockpuppet (Yes, Mrschimpf, I saw your user contributions list). The REAL Cable Guy (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notes:
In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'm sorry for the constant block evading that went on for over a month, and lied about it. If unblocked, I could make a few grammar corrections to pages that might have some errors. I'm only here cause I like to edit articles about TV. I also want my community ban uplifted and this constant semi-protection garbage to end. And for the record, I did not edit pages like WRC-TV, KOMU-TV, and KTBC, among a few others, and I never used 50.26.125.175 to sockpuppet (Yes, Mrschimpf, I saw your user contributions list). [[User:TheREALCableGuy|The REAL Cable Guy]] ([[User talk:TheREALCableGuy#top|talk]]) 13:50, 28 October 2013 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm sorry for the constant block evading that went on for over a month, and lied about it. If unblocked, I could make a few grammar corrections to pages that might have some errors. I'm only here cause I like to edit articles about TV. I also want my community ban uplifted and this constant semi-protection garbage to end. And for the record, I did not edit pages like WRC-TV, KOMU-TV, and KTBC, among a few others, and I never used 50.26.125.175 to sockpuppet (Yes, Mrschimpf, I saw your user contributions list). [[User:TheREALCableGuy|The REAL Cable Guy]] ([[User talk:TheREALCableGuy#top|talk]]) 13:50, 28 October 2013 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm sorry for the constant block evading that went on for over a month, and lied about it. If unblocked, I could make a few grammar corrections to pages that might have some errors. I'm only here cause I like to edit articles about TV. I also want my community ban uplifted and this constant semi-protection garbage to end. And for the record, I did not edit pages like WRC-TV, KOMU-TV, and KTBC, among a few others, and I never used 50.26.125.175 to sockpuppet (Yes, Mrschimpf, I saw your user contributions list). [[User:TheREALCableGuy|The REAL Cable Guy]] ([[User talk:TheREALCableGuy#top|talk]]) 13:50, 28 October 2013 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
