User talk:WPchanger2011

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WPchanger2011 (talk | contribs) at 01:12, 17 February 2023 (i hope it works...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, WPchanger2011, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 05:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! WPchanger2011 (talk) 20:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo
Hello! WPchanger2011, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! WPchanger2011 (talk) 20:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thunkable (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: So if I do not find somebody soon (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Homo wikiaddictus

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Homo wikiaddictus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WPchanger2011 why would you create this page and leave an edit summary of "quick before speedy delete"? ~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Eejit43 (Jumping in as I removed the CSD tag.) I think the summary was because the original redirect was targeting a non-existent page which would have made it WP:G8able. TartarTorte 13:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TartarTorte ah I see, now that makes a lot more sense. Thanks! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
so you are going to delete this... Thanks, WPchanger2011 (page | talk | contributions) 23:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, i see that it's kept. Thanks, WPchanger2011 (page | talk | contributions) 23:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 00:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A block

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

WPchanger2011 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Ponyo If I used this account in good faith, and even apologise for my edits on the user talk of 344766480A. However I didn't do anything wrong, and I tried my best to help build this encyclopedia, unlike what I did back in 2022. But now I'm a better person, did nothing wrong. Yes, maybe I have made mistakes, but I did not know I would get blocked without warning. And just because someone is a sockpuppet doesn't mean you should revert every edit, even ones in good faith and ones that people even sent thanks. Any response :(? So you can give reasons, but don't just not respond. And I hope you're nice per WP:5P4 Thanks, WPchanger2011 (page

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= @Ponyo If I used this account in good faith, and even apologise for my edits on the user talk of 344766480A. However I didn't do anything wrong, and I tried my best to help build this encyclopedia, unlike what I did back in 2022. But now I'm a better person, did nothing wrong. Yes, maybe I have made mistakes, but I did not know I would get blocked without warning. And just because someone is a sockpuppet doesn't mean you should revert ''every'' edit, even ones in good faith and ones that people even sent thanks. Any response :(? So you can give reasons, but don't just not respond. And I hope you're nice per [[WP:5P4]] Thanks, ''WPchanger2011'' ([[User:WPchanger2011|page]]  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= @Ponyo If I used this account in good faith, and even apologise for my edits on the user talk of 344766480A. However I didn't do anything wrong, and I tried my best to help build this encyclopedia, unlike what I did back in 2022. But now I'm a better person, did nothing wrong. Yes, maybe I have made mistakes, but I did not know I would get blocked without warning. And just because someone is a sockpuppet doesn't mean you should revert ''every'' edit, even ones in good faith and ones that people even sent thanks. Any response :(? So you can give reasons, but don't just not respond. And I hope you're nice per [[WP:5P4]] Thanks, ''WPchanger2011'' ([[User:WPchanger2011|page]]  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= @Ponyo If I used this account in good faith, and even apologise for my edits on the user talk of 344766480A. However I didn't do anything wrong, and I tried my best to help build this encyclopedia, unlike what I did back in 2022. But now I'm a better person, did nothing wrong. Yes, maybe I have made mistakes, but I did not know I would get blocked without warning. And just because someone is a sockpuppet doesn't mean you should revert ''every'' edit, even ones in good faith and ones that people even sent thanks. Any response :(? So you can give reasons, but don't just not respond. And I hope you're nice per [[WP:5P4]] Thanks, ''WPchanger2011'' ([[User:WPchanger2011|page]]  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WPchanger2011&oldid=1139812491"