User talk:Wolverine XI: Difference between revisions
→New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive: new section Tag: |
→note re ideas: new section |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
|} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
|} [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1219352352 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1219352352 --> |
||
== note re ideas == |
|||
hi. i like your ideas, for a possible "hall of fame." i lfeft some comments at village pump [[User:Sm8900|Sm8900]] ([[User talk:Sm8900|talk]]) 20:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:22, 17 April 2024
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Million Award for brown bear
The Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring Brown bear (estimated annual readership: 1,270,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
- Wow! Thanks a lot. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 14:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fishing cat
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fishing cat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 00:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fishing cat
The article Fishing cat you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Fishing cat for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 00:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey, Wolverine. I've been asked to look into your behaviour on the GANs for this article. Please take a step back for a little while - two editors have given some good advice on improving the article, and I'm sure they are both willing to give you feedback on your changes. However, comments like this are both unproductive and unfair to the reviewer. Please remember to remain civil and assume good faith on the part of others. Thanks, — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ingenuity: Allow me to explain. I'm not attempting to act impolite. As you can see, I modified fishing cat and got it ready for GA. Grungaloo failed the article for lack of broadness without allowing me to comment. All right, so I woke up early the following morning and added what little information I could locate about the species. I then wrote a note on Grungaloo's talk page for it. I nominated it again after following Grungaloo's advice. Fritzmann appeared and quickly failed the article on the grounds that I had not, in fact, followed Grungaloo's recommendations. What struck me about Fritzmann was their statement "the only addition was a section on infections." At GAN nominaters should let the editor make corrections to the article, not to fail it for that reason. In addition, Fritzmann overreacted by criticizing me harshly for my prior behavior even though I had been acting well lately. I think there is a misunderstanding here and that both of us are in the wrong. The aforementioned comment is what really caught my attention. Additionally, the issue with their quick fails is that, despite my best efforts, there is not enough scientific literature to support their claims. Fritzmann, I'd like to talk to you to make things okay. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 18:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Brown bear
On 29 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brown bear, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in some rare cases, large Siberian tigers prey on adult brown bears? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brown bear. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brown bear), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Wolverine in Oregon!!
Hi!
Just thought you may want to add this to the wolverine article. Wolverine spotted multiple times in Eugene, Oregon. Wolverine’s are not thought to live in Oregon. https://www.koin.com/video/wolverine-spotted-in-eugene-suspected-to-be-same-one-seen-on-oregon-coast/9580910/
Best,
Doug 2601:1C2:4301:2320:352C:91B4:A7D6:B714 (talk) 01:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'll see what I can do. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 08:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Djong (ship) has an RfC
Talk:Djong (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment-- your comment would be greatly appreciated Merzostin (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
note re ideas
hi. i like your ideas, for a possible "hall of fame." i lfeft some comments at village pump Sm8900 (talk) 20:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)