Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology/Evidence/Jokestress/Editing outside Sexology
David Fuchs' asked about our editing outside sexology.
Jokestress
My 49,000+ edits cover the full range of Wikipedia topics and are rarely disputed.
Of 2,100+ articles I created, at least 50 (~2%) are Sexology articles, including
- Archives of Sexual Behavior
- International Academy of Sex Research
- Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- International Association for the Treatment of Sexual Offenders
- American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapists
- Richard Pillard
- Richard Green (sexologist)
- Jack Drescher
- Susan Coates
- Ira Pauly
- Glen Gabbard
- Stephen B. Levine
- Heino Meyer-Bahlburg
- Martin Kafka
- Robert Taylor Segraves
- Abram Bennett
- Lothar Kalinowsky
- Randi Ettner
- Margaret Nichols
- Judd Marmor
- Vernon Rosario
- Paula Rodriguez Rust
- Louis Gooren
- Malgorzata Lamacz
- Dan Karasic
- William O'Donohue
- Emil Gutheil
- Benjamin Karpman
- Fred Berlin
- Allen Frances
- Joseph LoPiccolo (psychology)
- Fritz Klein (sex researcher)
- Ronald Langevin
- Betty Steiner
- James D. Weinrich
- Martin S. Weinberg
- A. Albert Yuzpe
- Bruce Rind
- Emanuel Hammer
- Bernard Glueck, Sr.
- Ethel Person
Perhaps 10 of those (~0.5%) have been substantively challenged (all by Cantor) and resolved via talk pages, including
- Simon LeVay - Cantor helped suppress a New York Times article by Roy Porter and a book by Dorothy Nelkin via tag team consensus because they mentioned eugenics
- Benjamin Scale - Cantor attempted to get this competing conceptualization deleted [1]
- Androphilia and gynephilia (total rewrite) - Cantor attempted to get this competing conceptualization deleted [2]
- Kenneth Zucker - Cantor colleague
- Peter Collins (psychiatrist) - Cantor colleague
- Kenneth Zucker - Cantor colleague
- Susan Bradley - Cantor colleague
- The Man Who Would Be Queen - Cantor colleague's book
Though I believe my edits on the whole were fair and neutral, I acknowledge a COI on those edits in 2005-2009. None of these have been substantively edited by either of us since 2009 by mutual agreement.
I've authored many articles on Canadian sex researchers that stand unchallenged:
I've even authored articles on Canadian CAMH sex researchers that have stood unchallenged:
Challenges only arise during James Cantor's COI editing / self-promotion.
Cantor
Few edits unrelated to Sexology/self-promotion. Of outside edits, three notable behaviors:
- Challenging the notability of prominent transgender people and organizations (none of which I've ever edited):
- In 2013 Cantor began promoting views of other allies outside sexology. Cantor's frequent ally Alice Dreger attacked a critic of Jared Diamond named Patrick Tierney. Dreger is the same person who attacked me in a journal Cantor helps edit. Cantor began shaping aspects of Diamond's biography to match Dreger's POV in this series of edits: [14] As in his edits to my biography, uninvolved editors reverted his changes as biased. [15]
- I have been completely uninvolved at Diamond/Tierney, but the pattern of Cantor's disputes with other editors over slanted content is the same. If there is a topic ban at sexology for him, I believe this new pattern will also require monitoring. Jokestress (talk) 21:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Other editors
User:WLU and User:Legitimus are excellent editors outside of sexology. Like me, they have never been blocked.
User:Flyer22 and User:Herostratus are generally good editors, though their conduct has led to conflicts and blocks. They get too emotionally invested in some topics, most notably sexology.