Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Return to Requests for page protection. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection

Ravi Shankar producer

• Ravi Shankar producer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Page related to tollywood movie producer Ravi Shankar Producer (talk) 11:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined Page has been deleted; please do not use Wikipedia for advertising purposes. Lectonar (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Sarah Geronimo

• List of awards and nominations received by Sarah Geronimo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Increase incidents of disruptive editing. User Dha BSMYR has been adding non-notable subsidiary awards that are mostly not high-quality sources (Imdb) or unsourced content. Other editors have reverted the edits, but does not seem to have changed their behavior. Worth protecting page as user seems to be newly registered and with under 10 edits. The article's talk page indicates that there has been this type of problem with a number of IP or new editors adding non-notable awards. [1] [2] [3] [4] Itssheenabautista (talk) 12:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Dha BSMYR (talk · contribs). for one week, so no need to protect. We generally do not block when the problem is one user, and instead deal with that user. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Cuddalore Lok Sabha constituency

• Cuddalore Lok Sabha constituency (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Continuous vandalism by IP users. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 13:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Karur Lok Sabha constituency

• Karur Lok Sabha constituency (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism JoshuaJ28 (talk) 13:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Tenkasi Lok Sabha constituency

• Tenkasi Lok Sabha constituency (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism JoshuaJ28 (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Dihydrogen monoxide parody

• Dihydrogen monoxide parody (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 13:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Soy boy

• Soy boy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism from various IP addresses since 09:40, 31 March 2024. Panian513 14:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One vandal editing twice, then getting reverted in the past ~10 days is not frequent vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport

• Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Ed Young (Fellowship Church)

• Ed Young (Fellowship Church) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The Wikipedia page for Pastor Ed Young has experienced persistent non-constructive edits and the addition of potentially biased or poorly sourced contentious material, particularly within the "Lifestyle" section of the article. This section relies on an investigative report from WFAA, which utilizes unnamed sources, raising significant concerns about the verifiability and reliability of the information. Additionally, the Dallas News article that supports the WFAA piece does not provide independent verification but merely echoes the original report.

Recent discussions on the talk page and BLP talk page have highlighted recurring issues with these edits potentially breaching BLP policy. The repeated addition of this material without a consensus indicates a risk of disseminating unverified or misleading information, which could be damaging to the subject of the article and misleading for readers.

5dondons (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)