Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 December 25: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
re
Line 79: Line 79:


*'''Delete''' per nom; no objection to creation of an inline tag if people think it'd be useful. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 01:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom; no objection to creation of an inline tag if people think it'd be useful. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 01:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' I concur with Nikkimaria even though I brought up the inline tags above. [[User:Trialpears|Trialpears]] ([[User talk:Trialpears|talk]]) 21:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:36, 28 December 2023

< December 24
December 26 >

December 25

Template:Ala Hazrat family completed

Unused and unsourced family tree chart. Happy to consider userfication if not ready. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Numidia dynasty

All redlinks in Arabic. No use here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Paraná Clube squad

Blanked last month as the club has been demoted to a bottom tier level. No links for any notable team members. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Santa Cruz Futebol Clube squad

Contains no links. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sir Milton Margai sidebar

Unused and only contains two direct links related to the subject. No navigation with this sidebar. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ōminato Line map

Unused and not needed. Ōminato Line has a route map in the infobox on the article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Husiatyn Raion

All of these raions were abolished in 2020. The links featured in these navboxes have been replaced by other navboxes. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TLE

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created a few weeks ago by a mostly inactive editor. Possibly an experiment; OK to userfy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Imported it from other language wikis, feel free to do anything, I don't care (as I am mostly inactive editor). Euglenos sandara (talk) 14:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Indian deities

Overlapping with {{Hindu deities and texts}}. No clear distinction of deities as South Indian; most are pan-Indian, pan-Hindu deities Redtigerxyz Talk 06:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AI-generated images

Unused and unneeded. If an image is usable under Wikipedia:Image use policy and works as an illustrative aid under Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images, that image may be used without regard for how it was made, and there is no problem with that image being machine-generated. Whatever problem may be perceived can not be solved by providing "proper attribution" textually in the article itself, and there is no requirement for such attribution for such images, just as there is no requirement for such attribution for any other images. And requiring such attribution would worsen the articles, burdening them with unnecessary text. If an image has copyright problems it should be deleted. This template can't do anything about that. —Alalch E. 01:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment There appear to be far fewer AI images in articles than were expected (when omitting the ones used specifically to describe AI topics). 3df (talk) 20:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AI-generated sources

Unused and redundant to Template:Unreliable sources. This is just about unreliable sources. A separate template listing one reason why sources used would be unreliable, but there are many reasons for a source to be an unreliable source, and separate templates are not needed for each of those scenarios. There is nothing special about sources which are unreliable for this reason relative to unreliable sources in general in terms of practical implications. —Alalch E. 01:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This may be better as an inline tag. Something like [AI-generated source?]. --Trialpears (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • {{Unreliable source?}} and {{Better source needed}} cover inline use.—Alalch E. 15:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      Sure, but the more important question is if it's more useful. It can be easier to deal with the problem if you know exactly what's wrong. It's faster to recognize AI generated text if told to look for it for instance. --Trialpears (talk) 17:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      A new tag like that could be helpful if it's possible the contents of the source itself are AI generated in a problematic way. For a source that might not exist, I had been wondering if a [nonexistent source?] inline would be appropriate. 3df (talk) 18:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree with Trialpears. This seems like it would function better as an inline tag to better identify the specific problems. TheBritinator (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom; no objection to creation of an inline tag if people think it'd be useful. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:55, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I concur with Nikkimaria even though I brought up the inline tags above. Trialpears (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_December_25&oldid=1192343554"