Wikipedia:WikiProject Connecticut/Latest article changes

Recent changes

Recent changes to WikiProject Connecticut pages.

Alerts

Recent developments to pages under the scope of WikiProject Connecticut. For an archive of older alerts, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Connecticut/Article alerts/Archive.

Did you know 20 Apr 2024 – September 2023 New York floods (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Tails Wx (t · c); see discussion Articles for deletion 09 May 2024 – Matthew W. McKeon (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Psychastes (t · c); see discussion (3 participants) 07 May 2024 – Waggle Foundation (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Teratix (t · c); see discussion (1 participant) 06 May 2024 – The Queen Killing Kings (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Keivan.f (t · c); see discussion (1 participant) 30 Apr 2024 – Tom Freston (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Ltbdl (t · c); see discussion (4 participants; relisted) 27 Apr 2024 – Steven James Bartlett (talk · edit · hist) AfDed by Psychastes (t · c) was closed as keep by Guerillero (t · c) on 05 May 2024; see discussion (7 participants) Proposed deletions 01 May 2024 – Waggle Foundation (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by Teratix (t · c) was deproded by Kvng (t · c) on 07 May 2024 Categories for discussion 26 Apr 2024 – Category:Natural history of Connecticut (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Marcocapelle (t · c); see discussion Featured list candidates 13 Apr 2024 – United States congressional delegations from Connecticut (talk · edit · hist) was FL nominated by Staraction (t · c); see discussion Good article nominees 06 May 2024 – Battle of the Frogs (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Gobonobo (t · c); start discussion 16 Feb 2024 – Edith Roosevelt (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Thebiguglyalien (t · c); start discussion Peer reviews 31 Mar 2024 – Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by SafariScribe (t · c); see discussion Requested moves 28 Apr 2024 – American Athletic Conference Football Championship Game (talk · edit · hist) move request to American Athletic Conference football championship game by Dicklyon (t · c) was closed; see discussion Articles for creation 24 Apr 2024 – Draft:Sneako (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Sirdog (t · c) 01 Mar 2024 – Draft:Marquand and Co. (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Southport1639 (t · c) 29 Jan 2024 – Draft:John Canning Studios (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Restoration-gal (t · c) was declined by ToadetteEdit (t · c) on 06 May 2024

Assessment log

Recently assessed or reevaluated WikiProject Connecticut pages.

May 8, 2024 Renamed Draft:Eastern Diocese of the Polish National Catholic Church renamed to User:Tony24644/Eastern Diocese of the Polish National Catholic Church. List of Wesleyan University people renamed to List of Wesleyan University alumni and fictional characters. Assessed Goose Island (Guilford) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Josh Singer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Keney Park Golf Course (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) List of Wesleyan University alumni and fictional characters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Removed John Boswell (talk) removed. Draft:Regional Multicultural Magnet School (talk) removed. Draft:William M. Raveis, Jr. (talk) removed. May 4, 2024 Reassessed Amethyst (drag queen) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Assessed Emma Dunning Banks (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Oli Sihvonen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) May 3, 2024 Reassessed 2024 U.S. Classic (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t) David C. Sanford (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t) Assessed Category:Battles of the American Revolutionary War in Connecticut (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Battles of the War of 1812 in Connecticut (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Removed Draft:Where ART Thou? (talk) removed.

Deletion discussions

Transcluded from and further information found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Connecticut.

Connecticut Matthew W. McKeon Matthew W. McKeon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR, top cited work appears to only have 20 citations in scholar, and no reviews on any published books. Psychastes (talk) 00:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:NPROF. Appears that the article's original author created a number of articles for various philosophy professors at Michigan State University of questionable notability. Longhornsg (talk) 03:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Philosophy, Connecticut, and Michigan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Delete. My off-wiki experience evaluating philosophers is that it's kind of strange. They often don't have many journal citations, nor books with many reviews, but the other philosophers in the same subdiscipline still have a strong idea who the important ones are, and I don't know how to guess that from the public record. In the case of McKeon, we definitely have nothing in the citation record nor the article that would suggest notability. Searching for reviews of his book The Concept of Logical Consequence is confusing because of Etchemendy's very notable and well cited book with the same title. I found only one review, by Núñez Puertas in Apuntes Filosóficos [1], far from enough even to justify an article on the book instead of its author. He does appear to have another book, Arguments and Reason-Giving, for which I found no reviews at all. In the absence of access to whatever information the philosophers use to evaluate their own, I think we have to go on what we can see for ourselves, and that's not very much. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC) Waggle Foundation Waggle Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails the notability guideline for organisations. PROD contested, citing four sources which, upon investigation, all turned out to contribute nothing to notability: Parade, CMT and People are puffy tabloid pieces based on a press release (People is the most honest/shameless about this: "It was such an unexpected major expense at an already tough time," Lambert, 36, said in a press release.) They don't even cover Waggle beyond the barest of passing mentions; they're about a separate fund Miranda Lambert set up in partnership. The Day a local Connecticut newspaper writing about a local business, exactly the sort of coverage WP:AUD excludes from notability considerations. These sources are so flimsy I am honestly a bit ticked off that the PROD was contested. – Teratix ₵ 15:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organizations, Websites, and Connecticut. – Teratix ₵ 15:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC) Delete - this does not pass GNG. The Day is a moderately-sized regional paper that can count towards notability for some topics, but local-interest pieces like this do not. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't meet NORG, references are primary. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC) The Queen Killing Kings The Queen Killing Kings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The article has some sources, but I could not find sustained coverage and to me it appears that it doesn't meet the criteria laid out at WP:NMUSIC. I think the community should decide whether this band merits having their own page. Keivan.fTalk 05:49, 6 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Connecticut. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC) Tom Freston Tom Freston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) fails general notability guideline. likely an autobiography. ltbdl (talk) 16:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America. ltbdl (talk) 16:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Note Please note that Tfreston (talk · contribs), who purports to be the subject, began to edit the article in July 2016 and has virtually stripped out all of the sources; this is the last edit before they became involved, and this edit from several months ago was the last before the subject stripped out all sources, including about basic biographical information such as children and marriage. This may be a case where COI has to be flagged and the mentioned editor may have to be blocked from editing their own article, which had proper sources before then. @Ltbdl:, can you let me know what you think of what I presented? Nate • (chatter) 18:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Comment: Good Lord, they really have removed all of the sources in the article. mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | Talk • Contributions) 19:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Keep but restore to pre-COI'd state. With profiles in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and CNBC, he's clearly notable, we just have to keep him from trying to write an autobiography. Jfire (talk) 03:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)