|This article needs additional citations for verification. (July 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
|Part of a series on|
|Types of Reading|
|Learning to Read|
According to the alphabetic principle, letters and combinations of letters are the symbols used to represent the speech sounds of a language based on systematic and predictable relationships between written letters, symbols, and spoken words. The alphabetic principle is the foundation of any alphabetic writing system (such as the English variety of the Roman alphabet), which is one of the more common types of writing systems in use today.
Alphabetic writing systems that use an (in practice) almost perfectly phonemic orthography have a single letter for each individual speech sound and a one-to-one correspondence between sounds and the letters that represent them. Such systems are used, for example, in the modern languages Estonian, Finnish, Italian, Spanish, Georgian, Hungarian and Turkish. Such languages have a straightforward spelling system, enabling a writer to predict the spelling of a word given its pronunciation and similarly enabling a reader to predict the pronunciation of a word given its spelling. Ancient languages with such almost perfectly phonemic writing systems include Avestic, Latin, Tamil, Vedic, and Sanskrit (Devanāgarī/Abugida, see also Vyakarana). On the other hand, French and English have a strong difference between sounds and symbols.
The alphabetic principle does not underlie logographic writing systems like Chinese or syllabic writing systems such as Japanese kana. Korean, along with Chinese and Japanese, is a member of the CJK group and shares origins for many of the symbols. Hangul, Korean writing system, is actually strongly alphabetic while it may look like logographic or syllabic to outsiders.
Most orthographies that use the Latin writing system are imperfectly phonological and diverge from that ideal to a greater or lesser extent. This is because the ancient Romans designed the alphabet specifically for Latin. In the Middle Ages, it was adapted to the Romance languages, the direct descendants of Latin, as well as to the Celtic, Germanic, Baltic, and some Slavic languages, and finally to most of the languages of Europe.
English orthography is based on the alphabetic principle, but the acquisition of sounds and spellings from a variety of languages has made English spelling patterns confusing. Spelling patterns usually follow certain conventions but nearly every sound can be legitimately spelled with different letters or letter combinations. For example, the letters ee almost always represent /i/, but the sound can also be represented by the letter y.
The spelling systems for some languages, such as Spanish, are relatively simple because they adhere closely to the ideal one-to-one correspondence between sounds and the letter patterns that represent them. In English the spelling system is more complex and varies considerably in the degree to which it follows the stated pattern. There are several reasons for this, including: first, the alphabet has 26 letters, but the English language has 40 sounds that must be reflected in word spellings; second, English spelling began to be standardized in the 15th century, and most spellings have not been revised to reflect the long-term changes in pronunciation that are typical for all languages; and third, English frequently adopts foreign words without changing the spelling of those words.
Role of the alphabetic principle in beginning reading
Learning the connection between written letters and spoken sounds has been viewed as a critical heuristic to word identification for decades. Understanding that there is a direct relationship between letters and sounds enables an emergent reader to decode the pronunciation of an unknown written word and associate it with a known spoken word. Typically, emergent readers identify the majority of unfamiliar printed words by sounding them out. Similarly, understanding the relationship of letters and sounds is also seen as a critical heuristic for learning to spell.
Two contrasting philosophies exist with regard to emergent readers learning to associate letters to speech sounds. Proponents of phonics argue that this relationship needs to be taught explicitly and to be learned to automaticity, in order to facilitate the rapid word recognition upon which comprehension depends. Others, including advocates of whole-language who hold that reading should be taught holistically, assert that children can naturally intuit the relationship between letters and sounds.
But recent fMRI studies show that the rapid word recognition of fluent lexical reading is an Occipital Lobe to Temporal Lobe process along ventral pathways, and is not conjoint with the alphabetic decoding processing along dorsal pathways in the Parietal Lobe.Borowsky, Ron; Esopenko, Carrie; Cummine, Jacqueline; Sarty, Gordon (December 2007). "Neural Representations of Visual Words and Objects: A Functional MRI Study on the Modularity of Reading and Object Processing". Brain Topography 20 (2): 89–96. Retrieved 29 June 2016. See two-streams hypothesis.
- Wren, Sebastian. Exception Words, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/reading/topics/exception.html, September 30, 2007.
- Juel, Connie (1996). "27 Beginning Reading". In Rebecca Barr; Michael L. Kamil; Peter B. Mosenthal; P. David Pearson. Handbook of Reading Research, II 2. pp. 759–788.
- Connie Juel. Rebecca Barr; Michael L. Kamil; Peter B. Mosenthal; P. David Pearson, eds. "Handbook of Reading Research Vol. II". chapter 27 Beginning Reading. questia.com. pp. 759–788.
- Feitelson, Dina (1988). Facts and Fads in Beginning Reading: A Cross-Language Perspective. Ablex. ISBN 0-89391-507-6.
- Fiebach CJ, Friederici AD, Müller K, von Cramon DY (January 2002). "fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition". J Cogn Neurosci 14 (1): 11–23. doi:10.1162/089892902317205285. PMID 11798383.
- Proverbio AM, Vecchi L, Zani A (March 2004). "From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading". J Cogn Neurosci 16 (2): 301–17. doi:10.1162/089892904322984580. PMID 15068599.