Category talk:People with disabilities

Category:People with disabilities is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Medicine

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles

Biography

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

RFC for mental illness inclusion[edit]

Closing per a WP:ANRFC request.
There is a rough consensus that this page should be a container category (and shouldn't contain articles directly), but no consensus whether to include mental illness or not (mostly due to the lack of discussion about it). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

User:DrKiernan has stated that he does not consider this category appropriate to use on people with mental illness, such as depression. I am in disagreement, on the basis that the definition of disability according to the Wikipedia article on the subject Disability and the dictionary definition of it both include mental conditions. As the two of us are unable to reach an agreement, I have opened a request for comment. Thank you. Asarelah (talk) 20:24, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The opening sentence of this RfC is false. It should be removed. DrKiernan (talk) 07:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The category is for people who are "formally recognized" as disabled. The concern over that definition remains unclarified since 2010[1]. I think it should be defined as people who explicitly self-identify, or are identified in reliable sources, as disabled. For example, Diana, Princess of Wales, who is one of the people Asarelah wishes to include, is not to my knowledge ever called disabled in reliable sources or by herself. Consequently, she (and others like her) should not be included. DrKiernan (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving the obvious issues with Diana aside, where does this leave historical figures who have been retrospectively identified as suffering from a non-mental disability by historians? Where does this leave people with retrospective doses of epilepsy or hydrocephalus? Charles II of Spain was regarded to by his contemporaries to have been bewitched due his clearly abnormal medical conditions, yet it is obvious to historians (and indeed, any layperson) that he was suffering from severe disabilities. If we can rely on historians to retrospectively diagnose people with physical disabilities, why can't the same principle be applied to mental disabilities? Asarelah (talk) 20:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the self-identification issues are related to biographies of living people. The same rules apply to LGBT categories for living people...but not for deceased people. We have plenty of historical people who didn't explicitly self-identify as LGBT who are considered such by historians, and thus in the articles. Perhaps the disability category should be applied the same way? Asarelah (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's my point. DrKiernan (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would be very wary about adding the vague parent category Category:People with disabilities to articles. It should not be done without an explicit reliable source to that effect. It is not for us to decide who is disabled. Many people suffer depression at various levels and would not consider themselves disabled. If there is no reliable source to allocate articles to a subcategory, which is more precise and can therefore be managed better, it would be wise to leave it out altogether. This can make it much harder in the case of psychological conditions as formal medical diagnoses of such conditions are often not in the public domain. Helen Online 10:23, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Previous subcategories related to depression were deleted as WP:NOTDEFINING. See relevant category deletion discussions at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_April_11#Category:People_diagnosed_with_clinical_depression and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_August_5#Category:People_with_clinical_depression. Category:People with major depressive disorder was also deleted in 2008. Helen Online 10:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged this category as a container, it should never include people directly. The more important question is, what sort of mental illnesses are considered disabilities, whereas which ones are considered just medical issues? --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:48, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with this. This should be a container. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discussion about criteria for this category and it's subcategories[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality#Adding another group of people to this guideline and contribute to the discussion there. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added comments there arguing my case, User:DrKiernan. Feel free to add your input. Asarelah (talk) 15:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Disabled People[edit]

More concise and accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.193.196.101 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]