Jump to content

Computer Go: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

20 April 2024

25 January 2024

2 September 2023

16 August 2023

14 July 2023

8 July 2023

18 June 2023

6 June 2023

4 June 2023

19 May 2023

9 May 2023

30 March 2023

29 March 2023

22 February 2023

29 January 2023

9 January 2023

31 December 2022

25 December 2022

21 December 2022

19 December 2022

18 December 2022

  • curprev 01:4101:41, 18 December 2022PC Screen talk contribsm 53,789 bytes +50 Pure MCTS bots were not close to professional level. They were still unable to beat even higher level amateurs, and required 4 stones of handicap to play evenly with professionals. The first ever time a Go AI was able to beat a professional and claim to be professional-level was with the original AlphaGo that played against Fan Hui undo

23 October 2022

23 August 2022

30 June 2022

19 June 2022

16 June 2022

  • curprev 06:4406:44, 16 June 2022SnowFire talk contribs 53,720 bytes −2,711 Cut down performance section some per recent tag, cleaning out some questionably cited stuff. Quoting a vague prediction from a thesis seems a bit shaky as a quality reference. Classic Go algorithms didn't do any worse at endgames than the rest of the game, so disagree with the rather SYNTH-y take here. undo

15 June 2022

  • curprev 23:0623:06, 15 June 2022SnowFire talk contribs 56,431 bytes +339 remove dated claim (AlphaGo certainly didn't use knowledge-based systems nor pattern matching). Move kind of random paragraph on its own, it doesn't really have anything to do with system design. undo

9 June 2022

29 May 2022

26 May 2022

15 May 2022

  • curprev 20:5020:50, 15 May 2022SnowFire talk contribs 55,111 bytes +489 no need for rp when the page numbers are so close together. not sure this is a great source to cite though since this method did not ultimately succed. I think some of these reference must have gotten confused at some point, because they don't seem to be in the right spot. undo

19 March 2022

6 February 2022

29 January 2022

24 January 2022

25 December 2021

24 December 2021

23 December 2021

17 December 2021

30 November 2021

26 November 2021

25 November 2021

16 October 2021

  • curprev 10:2710:27, 16 October 2021Citation bot talk contribs 53,653 bytes +460 Alter: template type, pages. Add: work, s2cid, bibcode, pmid, pages, issue, volume, doi, year, journal, date, title, magazine, authors 1-1. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by BrownHairedGirl | Linked from User:BrownHairedGirl/Articles_with_bare_links | #UCB_webform_linked 1328/2198 undo

14 October 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)