This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Database analysis, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Database analysisWikipedia:WikiProject Database analysisTemplate:WikiProject Database analysisDatabase analysis articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This page is not unambiguously promotional, the mere fact that a company, organization, or product is a page's subject does not, on its own, qualify that page for deletion under this criterion. This article does it's best to explain the purpose and uses of this company and it's products, including linking to sources and relevant information. This article can be expanded by others that have more information and background on this products.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlc19888 (talk • contribs)
Jlc19888 I have declined to delete this under that criteria, but it was a close one. I have gone through and removed some of the worst of the promotional language. However, this article will not be accepted in its current state. The first and most important thing that needs to happen to get this accepted is that it needs to cite some sources that are independant (in other words, not written by or affiliated with the company in any way) and that discuss Cribl in some depth. Ideally, every statement in the article should be able to be traced back to one or more such sources. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I went through and added sources for some of the things you pointed out. I Couldn't find anything publicly available on their Series A round, but I think I was able to Cite the rest of the things you pointed out. Thank you for looking this over. Jlc19888 (talk) 20:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
