Jump to content

Evolution of cells

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Frosty (talk | contribs) at 01:03, 10 July 2016 (Reverted edits by 130.105.201.181 (talk): Editing tests (HG) (3.1.21)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

See also: Abiogenesis
Part of a series on
Evolutionary biology
Darwin's finches by John Gould
Processes and outcomes
Natural history
History of evolutionary theory
Fields and applications
Social implications

Evolution of cells refers to the evolutionary origin and subsequent evolutionary development of cells. Cells first emerged at least 3.8 billion years ago.[1][2][3]

The first cells

The origin of cells was the most important step in the evolution of life on Earth. The birth of the cell marked the passage from pre-biotic chemistry to partitioned units resembling modern cells. The final transition to living entities that fulfill all the definitions of modern cells depended on the ability to evolve effectively by natural selection. This transition has been called the Darwinian transition.

If life is viewed from the point of view of replicator molecules, cells satisfy two fundamental conditions: protection from the outside environment and confinement of biochemical activity. The former condition is needed to keep complex molecules stable in a varying and sometimes aggressive environment; the latter is fundamental for the evolution of biocomplexity. If the freely floating molecules that code for enzymes are not enclosed in cells, the enzymes will automatically benefit the neighbouring replicator molecules. The consequences of diffusion in non-partitioned life forms might be viewed as "parasitism by default." Therefore, the selection pressure on replicator molecules will be lower, as the 'lucky' molecule that produces the better enzyme has no definitive advantage over its close neighbors. If the molecule is enclosed in a cell membrane, then the enzymes coded will be available only to the replicator molecule itself. That molecule will uniquely benefit from the enzymes it codes for, giving it a better chance to multiply.[citation needed]

Partitioning may have begun from cell-like spheroids formed by proteinoids, which are observed by heating amino acids with phosphoric acid as a catalyst. They bear much of the basic features provided by cell membranes. Proteinoid-based protocells enclosing RNA molecules could have been the first cellular life forms on Earth.[citation needed]

Another possibility is that the shores of the ancient coastal waters may have served as a mammoth laboratory, aiding in the countless experiments necessary to bring about the first cell. Waves breaking on the shore create a delicate foam composed of bubbles. Shallow coastal waters also tend to be warmer, further concentrating the molecules through evaporation. While bubbles made mostly of water tend to burst quickly, oily bubbles are much more stable, lending more time to the particular bubble to perform these crucial experiments. The phospholipid is a good example of a common oily compound prevalent in the prebiotic seas.[citation needed]

Phospholipids are composed of a hydrophilic head on one end, and a hydrophobic tail on the other. They possess an important characteristic for the construction of cell membranes; they can come together to form a bilayer membrane. A lipid monolayer bubble can only contain oil, and is not conducive to harbouring water-soluble organic molecules, but a lipid bilayer bubble [1] can contain water, and was a likely precursor to the modern cell membrane.[citation needed] If a protein came along that increased the integrity of its parent bubble, then that bubble had an advantage, and was placed at the top of the natural selection waiting list.[citation needed] Primitive reproduction may have occurred when the bubbles burst, releasing the results of the experiment into the surrounding medium. Once enough of the right compounds were released into the medium, the development of the first prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and multi-cellular organisms could be achieved.[4][citation needed]

Community metabolism

The common ancestor of the now existing cellular lineages (eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea) may have been a community of organisms that readily exchanged components and genes. It would have contained:

  • Autotrophs that produced organic compounds from CO2, either photosynthetically or by inorganic chemical reactions;
  • Heterotrophs that obtained organics by leakage from other organisms
  • Saprotrophs that absorbed nutrients from decaying organisms
  • Phagotrophs that were sufficiently complex to envelop and digest particulate nutrients, including other organisms.

The eukaryotic cell seems to have evolved from a symbiotic community of prokaryotic cells. DNA-bearing organelles like mitochondria and chloroplasts are remnants of ancient symbiotic oxygen-breathing bacteria and cyanobacteria, respectively, where at least part of the rest of the cell may have been derived from an ancestral archaean prokaryote cell. This concept is often termed the endosymbiotic theory. There is still debate about whether organelles like the hydrogenosome predated the origin of mitochondria, or vice versa: see the hydrogen hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotic cells.

How the current lineages of microbes evolved from this postulated community is currently unsolved but subject to intense research by biologists, stimulated by the great flow of new discoveries in genome science.[5]

Genetic code and the RNA world

Modern evidence suggests that early cellular evolution occurred in a biological realm radically distinct from modern biology. It is thought that in this ancient realm, the current genetic role of DNA was largely filled by RNA, and catalysis also was largely mediated by RNA (that is, by ribozyme counterparts of enzymes). This concept is known as the RNA world hypothesis.

According to this hypothesis, the ancient RNA world transitioned into the modern cellular world via the evolution of protein synthesis, followed by replacement of many cellular ribozyme catalysts by protein-based enzymes. Proteins are much more flexible in catalysis than RNA due to the existence of diverse amino acid side chains with distinct chemical characteristics. The RNA record in existing cells appears to preserve some 'molecular fossils' from this RNA world. These RNA fossils include the ribosome itself (in which RNA catalyses peptide-bond formation), the modern ribozyme catalyst RNase P, and tRNAs.[6][7][8][9]

The nearly universal genetic code preserves some evidence for the RNA world. For instance, recent studies of transfer RNAs, the enzymes that charge them with amino acids (the first step in protein synthesis) and the way these components recognise and exploit the genetic code, have been used to suggest that the universal genetic code emerged before the evolution of the modern amino acid activation method for protein synthesis.[6][7][10][11][12]

Canonical patterns

Although the evolutionary origins of the major lineages of modern cells are disputed, the primary distinctions between the three major lineages of cellular life (called domains) are firmly established.

In each of these three domains, DNA replication, transcription, and translation all display distinctive features. There are three versions of ribosomal RNAs, and generally three versions of each ribosomal protein, one for each domain of life. These three versions of the protein synthesis apparatus are called the canonical patterns, and the existence of these canonical patterns provides the basis for a definition of the three domains - Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya (or Eukaryota) - of currently existing cells.[13]

Using genomics to infer early lines of evolution

Instead of relying a single gene such as the small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene to reconstruct early evolution, or a few genes, scientific effort has shifted to analyzing complete genome sequences.[14]

Evolutionary trees based only on SSU rRNA alone do not capture the events of early eukaryote evolution accurately, and the progenitors of the first nucleated cells are still uncertain. For instance, analysis of the complete genome of the eukaryote yeast shows that many of its genes are more closely related to bacterial genes than they are to archaea, and it is now clear that archaea were not the simple progenitors of the eukaryotes, in contradiction to earlier findings based on SSU rRNA and limited samples of other genes.[15]

One hypothesis is that the first nucleated cell arose from two distinctly different ancient prokaryotic (non-nucleated) species that had formed a symbiotic relationship with one another to carry out different aspects of metabolism. One partner of this symbiosis is proposed to be a bacterial cell, and the other an archaeal cell. It is postulated that this symbiotic partnership progressed via the cellular fusion of the partners to generate a chimeric or hybrid cell with a membrane bound internal structure that was the forerunner of the nucleus. The next stage in this scheme was transfer of both partner genomes into the nucleus and their fusion with one another. Several variations of this hypothesis for the origin of nucleated cells have been suggested.[16] Other biologists dispute this conception[5] and emphasize the community metabolism theme, the idea that early living communities would comprise many different entities to extant cells, and would have shared their genetic material more extensively than current microbes.[17]

Quotes

The First Cell arose in the previously pre-biotic world with the coming together of several entities that gave a single vesicle the unique chance to carry out three essential and quite different life processes. These were: (a) to copy informational macromolecules, (b) to carry out specific catalytic functions, and (c) to couple energy from the environment into usable chemical forms. These would foster subsequent cellular evolution and metabolism. Each of these three essential processes probably originated and was lost many times prior to The First Cell, but only when these three occurred together was life jump-started and Darwinian evolution of organisms began. (Koch and Silver, 2005)[18]

"The evolution of modern cells is arguably the most challenging and important problem the field of Biology has ever faced. In Darwin's day the problem could hardly be imagined. For much of the 20th century it was intractable. In any case, the problem lay buried in the catch-all rubric "origin of life"---where, because it is a biological not a (bio)chemical problem, it was effectively ignored. Scientific interest in cellular evolution started to pick up once the universal phylogenetic tree, the framework within which the problem had to be addressed, was determined . But it was not until microbial genomics arrived on the scene that biologists could actually do much about the problem of cellular evolution." (Carl Woese, 2002) [19]

References

  1. ^ Schopf, JW, Kudryavtsev, AB, Czaja, AD, and Tripathi, AB. (2007). Evidence of Archean life: Stromatolites and microfossils. Precambrian Research 158:141-155.
  2. ^ Schopf, JW (2006). Fossil evidence of Archaean life. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 29;361(1470):869-85.
  3. ^ Peter Hamilton Raven; George Brooks Johnson (2002). Biology. McGraw-Hill Education. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-07-112261-0. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
  4. ^ This theory is expanded upon in The Cell: Evolution of the First Organism by Joseph Panno
  5. ^ a b Kurland, CG; Collins, LJ; Penny, D (2006). "Genomics and the irreducible nature of eukaryote cells". Science. 312 (5776): 1011–4. Bibcode:2006Sci...312.1011K. doi:10.1126/science.1121674. PMID 16709776.
  6. ^ a b Poole AM, Jeffares DC, Penny D (1998). "The path from the RNA world". J Mol Evol. 46 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/PL00006275. PMID 9419221.
  7. ^ a b Jeffares DC, Poole AM, Penny D (1998). "Relics from the RNA world". J Mol Evol. 46 (1): 18–36. doi:10.1007/PL00006280. PMID 9419222.
  8. ^ Orgel LE (2004). "Prebiotic chemistry and the origin of the RNA world". Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 39 (2): 99–123. doi:10.1080/10409230490460765. PMID 15217990.
  9. ^ Benner SA, Ellington AD, Tauer A; Ellington; Tauer (1989). "Modern metabolism as a palimpsest of the RNA world". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 86 (18): 7054–8. Bibcode:1989PNAS...86.7054B. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.18.7054. PMC 297992. PMID 2476811.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ Hohn MJ, Park HS, O'Donoghue P, Schnitzbauer M, Söll D; Park; O'Donoghue; Schnitzbauer; Soll (2006). "Emergence of the universal genetic code imprinted in an RNA record". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103 (48): 18095–100. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10318095H. doi:10.1073/pnas.0608762103. PMC 1838712. PMID 17110438.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ O'Donoghue P, Luthey-Schulten Z (2003). "On the Evolution of Structure in Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases". Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 67 (4): 550–73. doi:10.1128/MMBR.67.4.550-573.2003. PMC 309052. PMID 14665676.
  12. ^ Gesteland, RF et al. eds.(2006) The RNA World: The Nature of Modern RNA Suggests a Prebiotic RNA (2006) (Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY,).
  13. ^ Olsen, GJ; Woese, CR; Ibba, M.; Soll, D. (1997). "Archaeal genomics: an overview". Cell. 89 (7): 991–4. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80284-6. PMID 9215619.
  14. ^ Daubin, V; Moran, NA; Ochman, H (2003). "Phylogenetics and the cohesion of bacterial genomes". Science. 301 (5634): 829–32. Bibcode:2003Sci...301..829D. doi:10.1126/science.1086568. PMID 12907801.
  15. ^ Esser, C; Ahmadinejad, N; Wiegand, C; Rotte, C; Sebastiani, F; Gelius-Dietrich, G; Henze, K; Kretschmann, E; et al. (2004). "A genome phylogeny for mitochondria among alpha-proteobacteria and a predominantly eubacterial ancestry of yeast nuclear genes". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 21 (9): 1643–60. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh160. PMID 15155797.
  16. ^ Esser, C; Ahmadinejad, N; Wiegand, C; Rotte, C; Sebastiani, F; Gelius-Dietrich, G; Henze, K; Kretschmann, E; et al. (2004). "A genome phylogeny for mitochondria among alpha-proteobacteria and a preedominantly eubacterial ancestry of yeast nuclear genes". Mol Biol Evol. 21 (9): 1643–50. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh160. PMID 15155797.
  17. ^ Woese, C (2002). "On the evolution of cells". Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99 (13): 8742–7. Bibcode:2002PNAS...99.8742W. doi:10.1073/pnas.132266999. PMC 124369. PMID 12077305.
  18. ^ Koch, AL; Silver, S (2005). "The first cell". Advances in microbial physiology. Advances in Microbial Physiology. 50: 227–59. doi:10.1016/S0065-2911(05)50006-7. ISBN 9780120277506. PMID 16221582.
  19. ^ Woese, CR (2002). "On the evolution of cells". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99 (13): 8742–7. Bibcode:2002PNAS...99.8742W. doi:10.1073/pnas.132266999. PMC 124369. PMID 12077305.

This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Evolution of cells", which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL.

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution_of_cells&oldid=729118200"