From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Neo-Darwinism is the "modern synthesis" of Darwinian evolution through natural selection with Mendelian genetics, the latter being a set of primary tenets specifying that evolution involves the transmission of characteristics from parent to child through the mechanism of genetic transfer, rather than the "blending process" of pre-Mendelian evolutionary science. Neo-Darwinism can also designate Charles Darwin's ideas of natural selection separated from his hypothesis of Pangenesis as a Lamarckian source of variation involving blending inheritance.[1]

As part of the disagreement about whether natural selection alone was sufficient to explain speciation, George Romanes coined the term neo-Darwinism to refer to the version of evolution advocated by Alfred Russel Wallace and August Weismann with its heavy dependence on natural selection.[2] Weismann and Wallace rejected the Lamarckian idea of inheritance of acquired characteristics[3] that even Darwin took for granted.[4] The term was first used in 1895 to explain that evolution occurs solely through natural selection, and not by the inheritance of acquired characteristics resulting from use or disuse.[5] The basis for the complete rejection of Lamarckism was Weismann's germ plasm theory. Weismann realised that the cells that produce the germ plasm, or gametes (such as sperm and egg in animals), separate from the somatic cells that go on to make other body tissues at an early stage in development. Since he could see no obvious means of communication between the two, he asserted that the inheritance of acquired characteristics was therefore impossible; a conclusion now known as Weismann's barrier.[6]

From the 1880s to the 1930s, the term continued to be applied to the panselectionist school of thought, which argued that natural selection was the main and perhaps sole cause of all evolution.[7] From then until around 1947, the term was used for the panselectionist followers of R. A. Fisher.

Modern evolutionary synthesis[edit]

Following the development, from about 1937 to 1950, of the modern evolutionary synthesis, now generally referred to as the synthetic view of evolution or the modern synthesis, the term neo-Darwinian is often used to refer to contemporary evolutionary theory.[8] However, some have described such usage as incorrect;[1][5][9] with Ernst Mayr writing in 1984 that "the term neo-Darwinism for the synthetic theory is wrong, because the term neo-Darwinism was coined by Romanes in 1895 as a designation of Weismann's theory."[10]

Despite such objections, publications such as Encyclopædia Britannica[11][12] use this term to refer to current evolutionary theory. It is also used in the scientific literature, with the academic publisher Blackwell Publishing referring to "neo-Darwinism as practised today";[13] and some figures in the study of evolution such as Richard Dawkins[14] and Stephen Jay Gould[15] use the term in their writings and lectures.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b Kutschera U, Niklas KJ (2004). "The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis". Naturwissenschaften 91 (6): 255–76. doi:10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y. PMID 15241603. 
  2. ^ Gould The Structure of Evolutionary Theory p. 216
  3. ^ Kutschera U. 2003. A comparative analysis of the Darwin-Wallace papers and the development of the concept of natural selection. Theory in Biosciences 122, 343-359
  4. ^ Charles Darwin (1872), On the Origin of Species: Sixth British edition, 108
  5. ^ a b Reif W-E. Junker T. Hoßfeld U. (2000). "The synthetic theory of evolution: general problems and the German contribution to the synthesis". Theory in Biosciences 119 (1): 41–91(51). doi:10.1078/1431-7613-00004. 
  6. ^ Barbieri FD (1989). "The origin of Metazoa and Weismann's germ line theory". Riv. Biol. 82 (1): 61–74. PMID 2665023. 
  7. ^ "How to be Anti-Darwinian". Retrieved 2007-09-19. 
  8. ^ "The Modern Synthesis of Genetics and Evolution". Retrieved 2007-09-19. 
  9. ^ Pigliucci, M. (2007). "Do We Need An Extended Evolutionary Synthesis?" (PDF). Evolution 61 (12): 2743–2749. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00246.x. PMID 17924956. 
  10. ^ Mayr E. (1984). "What is Darwinism Today?". Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 145–156. JSTOR 192502. 
  11. ^ "neo-Darwinism". Retrieved 2007-09-19. 
  12. ^ "neo-Darwinism". Hutchinson Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2007-09-19. 
  13. ^ "A-Z Browser of Evolution". Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved 2007-09-19. 
  14. ^ "Lecture on Neo-Darwinism". : The Official Richard Dawkins Website. Retrieved 2007-09-19.  Note: On or before Jan 2013, the original Dawkins lecture referenced became inaccessible online at this url or any other cite that linked to this url.
  15. ^ "Challenges to Neo-Darwinism and Their Meaning for a Revised View of Human Consciousness" (PDF). Cambridge University: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Retrieved 2009-03-05. 

External links[edit]