Page semi-protected

Johnny Mnemonic (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Johnny Mnemonic
Johnny mnemonic ver1.jpg
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRobert Longo
Screenplay byWilliam Gibson
Based onJohnny Mnemonic
by William Gibson
Produced byDon Carmody
Starring
CinematographyFrançois Protat
Edited byRonald Sanders
Music by
Production
company
Johnny Mnemonic Productions[1]
Distributed byAlliance Communications[2] (Canada)
TriStar Pictures[1] (United States)
Release dates
  • April 15, 1995 (1995-04-15) (Japan)
  • May 26, 1995 (1995-05-26) (United States)
Running time
96 minutes[3]
Countries
LanguageEnglish[1]
Budget$26 million[4]
Box office$52.4 million (worldwide)[4]

Johnny Mnemonic is a 1995 cyberpunk film directed by Robert Longo in his directorial debut. Based on the 1981 story of the same name by William Gibson, it stars Keanu Reeves and Dolph Lundgren. Reeves plays the title character, a man with an overloaded, cybernetic brain implant designed to store information. The film portrays Gibson's dystopian, prophetic view of 2021 with the world wracked by a tech-induced plague, awash with conspiracies, and dominated by megacorporations, with strong East Asian influences.

Shot on location in Canada, with Toronto and Montreal filling in for the Newark and Beijing settings, a number of local sites, including Toronto's Union Station and Montreal's skyline and Jacques Cartier Bridge, are prominently featured.

A longer version (103 mins) of the film that is closer to the director's cut premiered in Japan on April 15, 1995, featuring a score by Mychael Danna and different editing.[5] The film was released in the United States on May 26, 1995.

Plot

In 2021, society is driven by a virtual Internet, which has created a degenerate effect called "nerve attenuation syndrome" or NAS. Megacorporations control much of the world, intensifying the class hostility already created by NAS.

Johnny is a "mnemonic courier" who discreetly transports sensitive data for corporations in a storage device implanted in his brain at the cost of his childhood memories. His current job is for a group of scientists in Beijing. Johnny initially balks when he learns the data exceeds his memory capacity even with compression, but agrees given the large fee will be enough to cover the cost of the operation to remove the device. Johnny warns that he must have the data extracted within a few days or suffer psychological damage. The scientists encrypt the data with three random images from a television feed and start sending these images to the receiver in Newark, New Jersey, but they are attacked and killed by the Yakuza led by Shinji (Akiyama) before the images can be fully transmitted. Johnny escapes with a portion of the images, but is pursued by both the Yakuza as well as security forces for Pharmakom, one of the mega-corporations run by Takahashi (Kitano), both seeking the data he carries. Johnny starts witnessing brief images of a female projection of an artificial intelligence (AI) who attempts to aid Johnny, but he dismisses her.

In Newark, Johnny meets with his handler Ralfi (Kier) to explain the situation, but finds Ralfi is also working with the Yakuza and wants to kill Johnny to get the storage device. Johnny is rescued by Jane (Meyer), a cybernetically-enhanced bodyguard, and members of anti-establishment Lo-Teks and their leader J-Bone (Ice-T). Jane takes Johnny to a clinic run by Spider (Rollins), who had installed Jane's implants. Spider reveals he was intended to receive the Beijing scientists' data, which is the cure for NAS stolen from Pharmakom; Spider claims Pharmakom refuses to release the cure as they are profiting off the mitigation of NAS. Unfortunately, even with the portion of the encryption images Johnny took and what Spider had received is not sufficient to decrypt Johnny's mind, and Spider suggests that they see Jones at the Lo-Teks' base. Just then, Karl "The Street Preacher" (Lundgren), an assassin hired by Takahashi, attacks the clinic, killing Spider as Johnny and Jane escape.

The two reach the Lo-Tek base and learn from J-Bone that Jones is a dolphin once used by the Navy which can help decrypt the data in Johnny's mind. Just as they start the procedure, Shinji and the Yakuza, Takahashi and his security forces, and the Street Preacher all attack the base, but Johnny, Jane, J-Bone and the other Lo-Teks are able to defeat all three forces. Takahashi turns over a portion of the encryption key before he dies, but this still is not enough to fully decrypt the data, and J-Bone tells Johnny that he will need to hack his own mind with Jones' help. The second attempt starts, and aided by the female AI, Johnny is able to decrypt the data and at the same time recover his childhood memories. The AI is revealed to be the virtual version of Johnny's mother who was also the founder of Pharmakom, angered at the company holding back the cure. As J-Bone transmits the NAS cure information across the Internet, Johnny and Jane watch from afar as the Pharmakom headquarters goes up in flames from the public outcry.

Cast

Production

Longo and Gibson originally envisioned making an art film on a small budget but failed to get financing. Longo commented that the project "started out as an arty 1½-million-dollar movie, and it became a 30-million-dollar movie because we couldn't get a million and a half."[6] Longo's lawyer suggested that their problem was that they were not asking for enough money and that studios would not be interested in such a small project.[7] The unbounded spread of the Internet in the early 1990s and the consequent rapid growth of high technology culture had made cyberpunk increasingly relevant, and this was a primary motivation for Sony Pictures's decision to fund the project in the tens of millions.[8] Val Kilmer was originally cast in the title role, and Reeves replaced him when Kilmer dropped out. Reeves' Canadian nationality opened up further financial options, such as Canadian tax incentives.[9] When Speed turned into a major hit in 1994, expectations were raised for Johnny Mnemonic, and Sony saw the film as a potential blockbuster hit.[10]

Longo's experiences with the financiers were poor, believing that their demands compromised his artistic vision. Many of the casting decisions, such as Lundgren, were forced upon him to increase the film's appeal outside of the United States. Longo and Gibson, who had no idea what to do with Lundgren, created a new character for him.[11] Lundgren had previously starred in several action films that emphasized his physique. He intended the role of the street preacher to be a showcase for further range as an actor, but his character's monologue was cut during editing.[12] Gibson said that the monologue, a sermon about transhumanism that Lundgren delivered naked, was cut due to fears of offending religious groups.[13] Kitano was cast to appeal to the Japanese market. Eight minutes of extra footage starring Kitano was shot for the Japanese release of the film.[9]

The film significantly deviates from the short story, most notably turning Johnny, not his bodyguard partner, into the primary action figure. Molly Millions is replaced with Jane, as the film rights to Molly had already been sold.[14] Nerve Attenuation Syndrome (NAS) is a fictional disease that is not present in the short story. NAS, also called "the black shakes", is caused by an overexposure to electromagnetic radiation from omnipresent technological devices and is presented as a raging epidemic. In the film, one pharmaceutical corporation has found a cure but chooses to withhold it from the public in favor of a more lucrative treatment program.[8][15] The code-cracking Navy dolphin Jones's reliance on heroin was one of many scenes cut during an editing process.[8] Gibson said that the film was "taken away and re-cut by the American distributor". He described the original film as "a very funny, very alternative piece of work", and said it was "very unsuccessfully chopped and cut into something more mainstream".[16] Gibson compared this to editing Blue Velvet into a mainstream thriller lacking any irony.[13] Prior to its release, critic Amy Harmon identified the film as an epochal moment when cyberpunk counterculture would enter the mainstream.[8] News of the script's compromises spurred pre-release concerns that the film would prove a disappointment to hardcore cyberpunks.[8]

The Japanese soundtrack was composed by Mychael Danna but re-composed by Brad Fiedel for the international version. It also contains tracks from independent industrial band Black Rain who had initially recorded a score for Robert Longo that had been rejected.

Release and marketing

I've never been comfortable with the marketing of my art ... but the nature of commodification sometimes requires my presence. In this case, I thought that the gentlemanly thing to do was to oblige them and go on-line. With the treasure hunt, it seemed to me that that is Sony trying to explore the landscape. It's not the users exploring cyberspace, it's Sony saying, 'Is this what we can do?' So I thought it was kind of cute.

Screenwriter William Gibson as quoted by the Los Angeles Times[8]

Simultaneous with Sony Pictures' release of the film, its soundtrack was released by Sony subsidiary Columbia Records, and the corporation's digital effects division Sony ImageWorks issued a CD-ROM videogame version for DOS, Mac and Windows 3.x.[8] The Johnny Mnemonic videogame, which was developed by Evolutionary Publishing, Inc. and directed by Douglas Gayeton, offered 90 minutes of full motion video storytelling and puzzles.[17] A Mega-CD/Sega CD version of the game was also developed, but never released despite being fully completed. This version was eventually leaked on the Internet many years later. A pinball machine based on the film designed by George Gomez was released in August 1995 by Williams.

Sony realised early on the potential for reaching their target demographic through Internet marketing, and its new-technology division promoted the film with an online scavenger hunt offering $20,000 in prizes. One executive was quoted as remarking "We see the Internet as turbo-charged word-of-mouth. Instead of one person telling another person something good is happening, it's one person telling millions!".[8] The film's website, the first official site launched by Columbia TriStar Interactive,[18] facilitated further cross-promotion by selling Sony Signatures-issued Johnny Mnemonic merchandise such as a "hack your own brain" T-shirt and Pharmakom coffee cups. Screenwriter William Gibson was deployed to field questions about the videogame from fans online. The habitually reclusive novelist, who despite creating in cyberspace one of the core metaphors for the internet age had never personally been on the Internet, likened the experience to "taking a shower with a raincoat on" and "trying to do philosophy in Morse code."[8]

The film grossed ¥73.6 million ($897,600) in its first 3 days in Japan from 14 screens in the nine key Japanese cities.[19] It was released in the United States and Canada on May 26 in 2,030 theaters, grossing $6 million in the opening weekend. It grossed $19.1 million in total in the United States and Canada and $52.4 million worldwide against its $26 million budget.[4]

Reception

The film holds an 18% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes from 38 critics. The website's consensus reads, "As narratively misguided as it is woefully miscast, Johnny Mnemonic brings the '90s cyberpunk thriller to inane new whoas – er, lows."[20] On Metacritic, the film has a score of 36/100 based on 25 reviews, which the site terms "generally unfavorable reviews".[21]

Variety's Todd McCarthy called the film "high-tech trash" and likened it to a video game.[22] Roger Ebert, the film critic for the Chicago Sun-Times, gave the film two stars out of four and called it "one of the great goofy gestures of recent cinema".[23] Owen Gleiberman of Entertainment Weekly rated it C− and called it "a slack and derivative future-shock thriller".[24] Conversely, Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle described it as "inescapably a very cool movie",[25] and Marc Savlov wrote in The Austin Chronicle that the film works well for both Gibson fans and those unfamiliar with his work.[26] Writing in The New York Times, Caryn James called the film "a disaster in every way" and said that despite Gibson's involvement, the film comes off as "a shabby imitation of Blade Runner and Total Recall".[27]

McCarthy said that the film's premise is its "one bit of ingenuity", but the plot, which he called likely to disappoint Gibson's fans, is simply an excuse for "elaborate but undramatic and unexciting computer-graphics special effects".[22] Ebert also called the plot an excuse for the special effects, and the conceit of having to deliver important information while avoiding enemy agents struck him as "breathtakingly derivative". Ebert furthermore felt that hiring a data courier instead of transmitting encrypted data over the internet makes no sense outside the artificiality of a film.[23] In his review for the Los Angeles Times, Peter Rainer wrote that the film, when stripped of the cyberpunk atmosphere, is recycled from noir fiction,[28] and LaSalle viewed it more positively as "a hard-boiled action story using technology as its backdrop".[25] Savlov called it "an updated D.O.A.",[26] and Ebert said the film's plot could have worked in any genre and been set in any time period.[23]

James criticized the film's lack of tension,[27] and Rainer called the film's tone too grim and lacking excitement.[28] McCarthy criticized what he saw as a "unrelieved grimness" and "desultory, darkly staged action scenes".[22] McCarthy felt the film's visual depiction of the future was unoriginal,[22] and Gleiberman described the film as "Blade Runner with tackier sets".[24] Savlov wrote that Longo's "attempts to out-Blade Runner Ridley Scott in the decaying cityscape department grow wearisome".[26] Savlov still found the film "much better than expected".[26] LaSalle felt the film "introduces a fantastic yet plausible vision of a computer-dominated age" and maintains a focus on humanity,[25] in contrast to Rainer, who found the film's countercultural pose to be inauthentic and lacking humanity.[28] James called the film murky and colorless;[27] Rainer's review criticized similar issues, finding the film's lack of lighting and its grim set design to give everything an "undifferentiated dullness".[28] McCarthy found the special effects to be "slick and accomplished but unimaginative",[22] though Ebert enjoyed the special effects.[23] Gleiberman highlighted the monofilament whip as his favorite special effect,[24] though James found it unimpressive.[27]

Although saying that Reeves is not a good actor, LaSalle said Reeves is still enjoyable to watch and makes for a compelling protagonist.[25] McCarthy instead found Reeves' character to be unlikable and one-dimensional.[22] James compared Reeves to a robot,[27] and Gleiberman compared him to an action figure.[24] Rainer posited that Reeves' character may seem so blank due to his memory loss.[28] Savlov said that Reeves' wooden delivery gives the film unintentional humor,[26] but Rainer found that the lack of humor throughout the film sapped all the acting performances of any enjoyment.[28] Gleiberman said that Reeves' efforts to avoid Valleyspeak backfire, giving his character's lines "an intense, misplaced urgency", though he liked the unconventional casting of Lundgren as a psychopathic street preacher.[24] Rainer highlighted Lundgren as the only actor to display mirth and said his performance was the best in the film.[28] James called Ice-T's role stereotypical and said he deserved better.[27]

Reeves's performance in the film earned him a Golden Raspberry Award nomination for Worst Actor (also for A Walk in the Clouds), but lost to Pauly Shore for Jury Duty. The film was filed under the Founders Award (What Were They Thinking and Why?) at the 1995 Stinkers Bad Movie Awards and was also a dishonourable mention for Worst Picture.[29]

In a career retrospective of Reeves' films for Entertainment Weekly, Chris Nashawaty ranked the film as Reeves' second worst, calling the film's fans "nuts" for liking it.[30] While acknowledging the film's issues, critic Ty Burr attributed its poor reviews to critics' unfamiliarity with Gibson's work.[31] The Quietus described the film as having "all the makings of a cult classic",[32] and its release to streaming sites in 2021 resulted in a passionate defense by Rowan Righelato in The Guardian, who said it was "a testament to Longo’s genius" that the film remained as eccentric as it was despite the studio's recut.[33] Inverse also recommended the film.[34] In a retrospective review from 2021, Peter Bradshaw, film critic for The Guardian, rated it 4/5 stars and wrote, "Perhaps it's quaint, but it's also watchable, and it is the kind of sci-fi that is genuinely audacious".[35] The Wachowskis used this film as template for The Matrix.[36]

The props from the film were transformed into sculptures by artist Dora Budor for her 2015 solo exhibition, Spring.[37][relevant?]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "Johnny Mnemonic (1995)". AFI Catalog of Feature Films. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  2. ^ "Johnny Mnemonic". Library and Archives Canada. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
  3. ^ "JOHNNY MNEMONIC". British Board of Film Classification. October 30, 1995. Retrieved November 26, 2017.
  4. ^ a b c "Johnny Mnemonic (1995)". Box Office Mojo (IMDb). Retrieved April 5, 2011.
  5. ^ Johnny Mnemonic Japanese release 1995, 103 minutes, Color, English/Japanese.
  6. ^ van Bakel, Rogier. "Remembering Johnny". Wired. Vol. 3, no. 6. Condé Nast Publications. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
  7. ^ Lewis, Peter H. (May 22, 1995). "ON LINE WITH William Gibson; Present at the Creation, Startled at the Reality". The New York Times. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i Harmon, Amy (May 24, 1995). "Crossing Cyberpunk's Threshold: Hollywood: Author William Gibson's dark view of the future hits the mainstream this week in Johnny Mnemonic". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 5, 2011.
  9. ^ a b Nashawaty, Chris (June 23, 1995). "Johnny Mnemonic faced financial woes". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  10. ^ Trenholm, Richard (December 22, 2021). "Before The Matrix, Johnny Mnemonic and Hackers led the internet movies of the '90s". CNET. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  11. ^ Riefe, Jordan (May 18, 2016). "Director Robert Longo Ruefully Recalls Johnny Mnemonic: 'I Had Post-Traumatic Stress From That Movie'". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  12. ^ Pinsker, Beth (June 16, 1995). "Dolph Lundgren wants to show he's a serious actor". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  13. ^ a b Henthorne, Tom (15 June 2011). William Gibson: A Literary Companion. McFarland & Company. pp. 77–78. ISBN 978-0-7864-6151-6.
  14. ^ Dillard, Brian J. "Johnny Mnemonic > Review". Allmovie (All Media Guide). Retrieved April 5, 2011.
  15. ^ Kehe, Jason (January 11, 2021). "2021 and the Conspiracies of Johnny Mnemonic". Wired.
  16. ^ Lincoln, Ben (October 19, 1998). "Arts: Cyberpunk on screen - William Gibson speaks". The Peak. 100 (7). Archived from the original on June 27, 2007.
  17. ^ Nashawaty, Chris (June 2, 1995). "Johnny Mnemonic". Entertainment Weekly. Time Warner. Retrieved April 5, 2011.
  18. ^ Graser, Marc (January 25, 1999). "Col caught in Web". Variety (Columbia Pictures 75th Anniversary ed.). p. 76.
  19. ^ Groves, Don (April 24, 1995). "'Mnemonic' bows big in Japan". Variety. p. 12. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
  20. ^ "Johnny Mnemonic Movie Reviews". Rotten Tomatoes (Flixster). Retrieved April 5, 2011.
  21. ^ "Johnny Mnemonic". Metacritic. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  22. ^ a b c d e f McCarthy, Todd (May 22, 1995). "Johnny Mnemonic". Variety. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  23. ^ a b c d Ebert, Roger (May 26, 1995). "Johnny Mnemonic". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  24. ^ a b c d e Gleiberman, Owen (June 9, 1995). "Johnny Mnemonic". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  25. ^ a b c d LaSalle, Mick (May 27, 1995). "'Mnemonic' Has a Cool Head / Keanu Reeves in futuristic computer age". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
  26. ^ a b c d e Savlov, Marc (June 2, 1995). "Johnny Mnemonic". The Austin Chronicle. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  27. ^ a b c d e f James, Caryn (May 26, 1995). "FILM REVIEW; Too Much on His Mind, Ready to Go BLOOEY". The New York Times. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  28. ^ a b c d e f g Rainer, Peter (May 26, 1995). "MOVIE REVIEW : A Head Case Named 'Johnny Mnemonic'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  29. ^ "1995 18th Hastings Bad Cinema Society Stinkers Awards". The Envelope. Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 3, 2007.
  30. ^ Nashawaty, Chris (March 31, 2019). "Keanu Reeves' best and worst movies, ranked". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  31. ^ Burr, Ty (November 17, 1995). "Johnny Mnemonic". Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  32. ^ Robb, David (December 21, 2021). "Hack The Matrix: How Johnny Mnemonic Predicted 2021". The Quietus. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  33. ^ Righelato, Rowan (30 April 2021). "Hear me out: why Johnny Mnemonic isn't a bad movie". The Guardian. Retrieved October 1, 2021.
  34. ^ Newby, Richard (May 11, 2021). "You Need to Watch the Weirdest Cyberpunk Movie". Inverse. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  35. ^ Bradshaw, Peter (May 6, 2021). "Johnny Mnemonic review – Keanu test-drives early Matrix prototype". The Guardian. Retrieved February 5, 2022.
  36. ^ Hemon, Aleksandar (September 3, 2012). "Beyond the Matrix". The New Yorker. Retrieved 12 June 2022.
  37. ^ "Dora Budor "Spring" at Swiss Institute, New York" (PDF). Mousse Magazine. July 8, 2015. Retrieved August 13, 2021.

External links