Jump to content

Kees de Jager

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spicemix (talk | contribs) at 23:08, 29 May 2021 (Honours and awards: wording). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Kees de Jager
Photograph of Kees de Jager, taken in 1967
Kees de Jager in 1967
Born
Cornelis de Jager

(1921-04-29)29 April 1921
Den Burg, Texel, Netherlands
Died27 May 2021(2021-05-27) (aged 100)[1]
Alma materUtrecht University
SpouseDoetie Rienks
Scientific career
Fields
InstitutionsUtrecht University
Doctoral advisorMarcel Minnaert

Cornelis "Kees" de Jager ([keːs ˈjaːɣər]; 29 April 1921 – 27 May 2021) was a Dutch astronomer who specialized in predicting solar variation to assess the Sun's impact on future climate. He was the General Secretary of the IAU from 1967 to 1973 and former director of the observatory at Utrecht. He was a fellow with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.

Personal life and education

Born in Den Burg, de Jager spent his school years in the Dutch East Indies.[2] From 1939 to 1945 he studied mathematics, physics and astronomy at Utrecht University.[2][3][4] On 13 October 1952 he obtained his PhD with a thesis called "The Hydrogen Spectrum of the Sun".[3] His supervisor was Marcel Minnaert.[4]

Kees died on 27 May 2021,[5] less than a month after he became a centenarian.[6]

Solar and stellar research

De Jager did work on stars and solar physics, in relation to which he was a founding editor of the journal Solar Physics.[7] In 1980 he was principal investigator of the Hard X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (HXIS) on board the Solar Maximum Mission satellite.[5] His work on solar flares was often done in collaboration with Zdeněk Švestka.

From 1978 onward de Jager did noted work on the most luminous stars, known as hypergiants.[8] From 1960 to 1986 de Jager was a professor at Utrecht University.[9][10]

Sun-climate relations

De Jager's later research focused on predicting solar variation to assess the Sun's impact on future climate. Usually solar activity is defined in terms of the Sun's toroidal magnetic field, the field component parallel to the solar equator. Sunspots are one expression of this component. De Jager introduced the poloidal field of the Sun, which connects its two poles, as a factor of possibly similar importance. He used proxies for both components and took 19-year running averages to eliminate all effects that last only one or two solar cycles.[11][better source needed] Next he plotted both components in a diagram, thus creating an experimental phase portrait. The track of the two components went from low to high activity around 1923. Around 2006 the same point has been passed in the opposite direction.[12] Thus solar activity in the 21st century is expected to be lower than it was for most of the 20th century. A reduction in solar activity means less energy input to the Earth as part of the Earth's energy budget, partially countering climate change.[13]

De Jager postulated that solar magnetic activity is the most significant contributor to tropospheric temperatures, with polar activity also being significant, and that with the subtraction of these factors from temperatures recorded over the preceding 400 years, peaks and dips in temperature could be observed, accounting for recent increase in global warming.[12] Similar theories have been rejected by other climate scientists as solar activity and global temperatures have diverged since 1975, with energy output from the Sun decreasing and Earth temperatures still increasing. Additionally, warming caused exclusively by the Sun would result in an even warming throughout the atmosphere, rather than the observed cooling in the upper atmosphere and warming in the lower atmosphere associated with greenhouse gases.[13]

Cyclosophy

Kees de Jager in 2011

Expanding on a 1990 paper presentation at the International Skeptics Conference, de Jager published an article for Skeptical Inquirer where he parodies numerology. In Adventures in Science and Cyclosophy, de Jager claims that many times pseudoscientific reasoning ignores coincidences dealing with the relationship between objects when there are unlimited data points. He states that measurements surrounding the Great Pyramids have been used to show a relationship with astronomy. To do so, he explains, anyone can use the law of large numbers[14] to relate to anything one would want, to try and prove there is some connection. As an illustration, he uses the example of his bicycle and the cosmos.[15][16] Enthusiasts in this formula have created a website that allows visitors to submit data to replicate de Jager's experiment.[17]

I measured the diameters of my bike's: -pedals, symbolizing the forward-going dynamics; -front wheel, which directs my ways into the unknown future; -lamp, enlightening my paths; -bell, through which I communicate with encounters. Thus I laid the building stones for a new holistic four-dimensional religion apt to the coming of the New Age of Aquarius: cyclosophy. The measurements were expressed in Holy Bike inches, being 17 mm. This is so since 1 is the first prime number and 17 the seventh, and because seven is the holy number. Calling P, W, L and B the four measured quantities, it turns out that P ^ 2 √ L x W = 1823 which is the ratio between the masses of the proton and the electron.... Coincidences occur regularly in numerical experiments, as in daily life ... are not rare ... Most people greatly underestimate the enormous amount of possible combinations between numbers. Adventures in Science and Cyclosophy[18]

According to Kendrick Frazier who attended the 1998 Second World Skeptics Congress in Heidelberg, Germany, de Jager's "dead-pan" description of how he took measurements throughout his house showing the "absurdities of those who attach great mystical significance to measurements of the Great Pyramid" had the audience "in stitches". Apparently "his home is in an astronomical observatory, a location, he said, 'that may be very close to the cosmos and well receptive to its incredible powers.'”[19]

Other activities

Stichting Skepsis

He was the General Secretary of the IAU from 1967 to 1973 and former director of the observatory at Utrecht.[20] In 1981, de Jager became a founding member of the World Cultural Council.[21] He was the first chairman of Stichting Skepsis from 1987 to 1998,[22] the first chairman of the European Council of Skeptical Organisations from 1994 to 2001,[23] and was also a Committee for Skeptical Inquiry fellow.[24][25]

De Jager joined his CSI peers by signing the "Deniers are not Skeptics" petition that asks the media to stop referring to climate change deniers as skeptics, with the petition stating "proper skepticism promotes scientific inquiry, critical investigation, and the use of reason in examining controversial and extraordinary claims", not "rejection of ideas without objective consideration".[26]

He spoke on astrology at the World Skeptics Congress in 1996.[27]

Honours and awards

In 1969 he became member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.[28] In 1990 he was elected a member of Academia Europaea.[29]

The asteroid 3798 de Jager was named for him.[34]

References

  1. ^ "Professor Kees de Jager overleden". www.texelsecourant.nl.
  2. ^ a b "In memoriam Kees de Jager, sterrenkundige (1921–2021)". astronomie.nl (in Dutch). Astronomie nl. 28 May 2021.
  3. ^ a b "Digital Concert & Special Magazine for astronomer Kiss de Jagger (100)". commentaryboxsports.com. Commentary Box Sports. 29 April 2021.
  4. ^ a b "Astrofysicus Kees de Jager draaide honderd rondjes om zijn zon". trouw.nl (in Dutch). Trouw. 1 May 2021.
  5. ^ a b "Een leven gewijd aan de zon". nrcl.nl (in Dutch). NRC. 28 May 2021.
  6. ^ van den Ham, Hans (29 April 2021). "Utrechtse astronoom Kees de Jager is 100, maar de sterrenhemel kan hij niet meer zien". Algemeen Dagblad (in Dutch). Retrieved 1 May 2021.
  7. ^ "SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)". adsabs.harvard.edu. Bibcode:1969SoPh...10..243.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  8. ^ "Two Decades of Hypergiant Research" (PDF). festschrift. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
  9. ^ "Sterrenkundige en bedenker woord 'oerknal' Kees de Jager overleden". nos.nl (in Dutch). NOS.
  10. ^ a b "Sterrenkundige Kees de Jager (100) overleden". nhnieuws.nl (in Dutch). NH Nieuws. 28 May 2021.
  11. ^ Yaskell, S.H., Grand Phases On The Sun: The case for a mechanism responsible for extended solar minima and maxima (Trafford: 2013)
  12. ^ a b de Jager, Kees (1 April 2016). "Solar activity and its influence on climate". Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 87 (3): 7 – via Cambridge University Press.
  13. ^ a b Thomas Farmer, G.; Cook, John (2012). Climate Change Science: A Modern Synthesis. Springer Publishing. pp. 14, 475–476. ISBN 978-94-007-5756-1.
  14. ^ Lee, Adam (7 April 2008). "Popular Delusions IX: Numerology". Daylight Atheism. Patheos. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  15. ^ de Jager, Cornelis. "The Holy Bicycle". Geistige Nanrung Dein Forum. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  16. ^ Paulos, John Allen (9 June 2009). Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up. ISBN 9780809059188. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  17. ^ Hars, Florian. "Radosophie". Misz. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  18. ^ de Jager, Cornelis (1992). "Adventures in Science and Cyclosophy". Skeptical Inquirer. 16 (2): 167–172.
  19. ^ Kendrick, Frazier (November 1998). "Science and Reason, Foibles and Fallacies, and Doomsdays". CSI. Center for Inquiry. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
  20. ^ Schmadel, Lutz (5 August 2003). Dictionary of Minor Planet Names. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9783540002383 – via Google Books.
  21. ^ "About Us". World Cultural Council. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  22. ^ "Randverschijnselen in de wetenschap – Liber amicorum voor Kees de Jager". Stichting Skepsis website. Stichting Skepsis. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
  23. ^ Mahner, Martin (February 2002). "10th European Skeptics Congress: Rise and Development of Paranormal Beliefs in Eastern Europe". Skeptical Inquirer. 26 (1). CSICOP. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
  24. ^ Kreidler, Marc (3 April 2019). "Fellows and Staff | Skeptical Inquirer".
  25. ^ Farha, Bryan (29 May 2007). Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis. University Press of America. ISBN 9780761837725 – via Google Books.
  26. ^ "Deniers are not Skeptics". CSI. Center for Inquiry. 5 December 2014. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
  27. ^ Flynn, Tom (September 1996). "World Skeptics Congress Draws Over 1200 Participants". CSI. Center for Inquiry. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
  28. ^ "Cornelis de Jager". Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017.
  29. ^ "Cornelis de Jager". Academia Europaea. Archived from the original on 15 May 2020.
  30. ^ "Recipients of the Karl Schwarzschild Medal". The AG. Astronomische Gesellschaft German Astronomical Society. Archived from the original on 16 August 2016. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
  31. ^ "Short cv of C. de Jager". Cornelis de Jager. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  32. ^ "Previous winners of the George Ellery Hale Prize". Solar Physics Division. American Astronomical Society. Archived from the original on 13 August 2013. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
  33. ^ Kurtz, Paul (1990). "Skepticism in Europe: Brussels Conference Tackles Diverse Issues". Skeptical Inquirer. 15 (2): 221.
  34. ^ Lutz, Schmadel (5 August 2003). Dictionary of Minor Planet Names, Volume 1. Springer. ISBN 9783540002383. Retrieved 28 June 2016.