Jump to content

Lateralization of brain function: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 192.217.84.1 (talk) to last revision by The Thing That Should Not Be (HG (Custom))
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:
====Wernicke====
====Wernicke====


[[Germany|German]] [[physician]] [[Karl Wernicke]] continued in the vein of Broca's research by studying language deficits unlike Broca aphasias. Wernicke noted that not every deficit was in speech production; some were linguistic. He found that damage to the left [[Anatomical terms of location|posterior]], superior [[temporal lobe|temporal]] [[gyrus]] ([[Wernicke's area]]) caused language comprehension deficits rather than speech production deficits, a syndrome known as [[Wernicke's aphasia]].
[[Germany|German]] [[physician]] [[Karl Wernicke]] continued in the vein of Broca's research by studying language deficits unlike Broca aphasias. Wernicke noted that not every deficit was in speech production; some were linguistic. He found that damage to the left [[Anatomical terms of location|posterior]], superior [[temporal lobe|temporal]] [[gyrus]] ([[Wernicke's area]]) caused language comprehension deficits rather than speech production deficits, a syndrome known as [[Wernicke's aphasia]]. Weezy


====Advance in imaging technique====
====Advance in imaging technique====

Revision as of 14:54, 10 September 2010

Template:Image A longitudinal fissure separates the human brain into two distinct cerebral hemispheres, connected by the corpus callosum. The sides resemble each other and each hemisphere's structure is generally mirrored by the other side. Yet despite the strong similarities, the functions of each cortical hemisphere are different.

Broad generalizations are often made in popular psychology about certain functions (eg. logic, creativity) being lateralised, that is, located in the right or left side of the brain. These ideas need to be treated carefully because the popular lateralizations are often distributed across both sides.[1]

Many differences between the hemispheres have been observed, from the gross anatomical level to differences in dendritic structure or neurotransmitter distribution. For example, the lateral sulcus generally is longer in the left hemisphere than in the right hemisphere. However, experimental evidence provides little, if any, consistent support for correlating such structural differences with functional differences.[2] The extent of specialized brain function by area remains under investigation. If a specific region of the brain or even an entire hemisphere[3] is either injured or destroyed, its functions can sometimes be assumed by a neighboring region, even in the opposite hemisphere, depending upon the area damaged and the patient's age. Injury may also interfere with a pathway from one area to another. In this case, alternative (indirect) connections may exist which can be used to transmit the information to the target area. Such transmission may not be as efficient as the original pathway.

While functions are lateralized, the lateralizations are functional trends, which differ across individuals and specific function. Short of having undergone a hemispherectomy (removal of a cerebral hemisphere), no one is a "left-brain only" or "right-brain only" person.[4]

Brain function lateralization is evident in the phenomena of right- or left-handedness and of right or left ear preference, but a person's preferred hand is not a clear indication of the location of brain function. Although 95% of right-handed people have left-hemisphere dominance for language, only 18.8% of left-handed people have right-hemisphere dominance for language function. Additionally, 19.8% of the left-handed have bilateral language functions.[5] Even within various language functions (e.g., semantics, syntax, prosody), degree (and even hemisphere) of dominance may differ[6].

Left versus right

Linear reasoning[7] and language functions such as grammar and vocabulary[8] often are lateralized to the left hemisphere of the brain. Dyscalculia is a neurological syndrome associated with damage to the left temporo-parietal junction.[9] This syndrome is associated with poor numeric manipulation, poor mental arithmetic skill, and the inability to either understand or apply mathematical concepts.[10]

In contrast, prosodic language functions, such as intonation and accentuation, often are lateralized to the right hemisphere of the brain.[11][12] Functions such as the processing of visual and audiological stimuli, spatial manipulation, facial perception, and artistic ability seem to be functions of the right hemisphere.

There is some evidence[13] that the right hemisphere is more involved in processing novel situations, while the left hemisphere is most involved when routine or well rehearsed processing is called for.

Other integrative functions, including arithmetic,[14][15] binaural sound localization, and emotions, seem more bilaterally controlled.

Left hemisphere functions Right hemisphere functions
numerical computation (exact calculation, numerical comparison, estimation)
left hemisphere only: direct fact retrieval[14][15]
numerical computation (approximate calculation, numerical comparison, estimation)[14][15]
language: grammar/vocabulary, literal[16] language: intonation/accentuation, prosody, pragmatic, contextual[16]

History

Speech and language

Broca

One of the first indications of brain function lateralization resulted from the research of French physician Pierre Paul Broca, in 1861. His research involved the male patient nicknamed "Tan", who suffered a speech deficit (aphasia); "tan" was one of the few words he could articulate, hence his nickname. In Tan's autopsy, Broca determined he had a syphilitic lesion in the left cerebral hemisphere. This left frontal lobe brain area (Broca's Area) is an important speech production region. The motor aspects of speech production deficits caused by damage to Broca’s Area are known as Broca's aphasia. In clinical assessment of this aphasia, it is noted that the patient cannot clearly articulate the language being employed.

Wernicke

German physician Karl Wernicke continued in the vein of Broca's research by studying language deficits unlike Broca aphasias. Wernicke noted that not every deficit was in speech production; some were linguistic. He found that damage to the left posterior, superior temporal gyrus (Wernicke's area) caused language comprehension deficits rather than speech production deficits, a syndrome known as Wernicke's aphasia. Weezy

Advance in imaging technique

These seminal works on hemispheric specialization were done on patients and/or postmortem brains, raising questions about the potential impact of pathology on the research findings. New methods permit the in vivo comparison of the hemispheres in healthy subjects. Particularly, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are important because of their high spatial resolution and ability to image subcortical brain structures.

Handedness and language

Broca's Area and Wernicke’s Area are linked by a white matter fiber tract, the arcuate fasciculus [dubiousdiscuss]. This axonal tract allows the neurons in the two areas to work together in creating vocal language. In more than 95% of right-handed men, and more than 90% of right-handed women, language and speech are subserved by the brain's left hemisphere. In left-handed people, the incidence of left-hemisphere language dominance has been reported as 73%[17] and 61%.[5]

There are ways of determining hemispheric dominance in a person. The Wada Test introduces an anesthetic to one hemisphere of the brain via one of the two carotid arteries. Once the hemisphere is anesthetized, a neuropsychological examination is effected to determine dominance for language production, language comprehension, verbal memory, and visual memory functions. Less invasive (sometimes costlier) techniques, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging and Transcranial magnetic stimulation, also are used to determine hemispheric dominance; usage remains controversial for being experimental.

Movement and sensation

In the 1940s, Canadian neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield and his neurologist colleague Herbert Jasper developed a technique of brain mapping to help reduce side effects caused by surgery to treat epilepsy. They stimulated motor and somatosensory cortices of the brain with small electrical currents to activate discrete brain regions. They found that stimulation of one hemisphere's motor cortex produces muscle contraction on the opposite side of the body. Furthermore, the functional map of the motor and sensory cortices is fairly consistent from person to person; Penfield and Jasper's famous pictures of the motor and sensory homunculi were the result.

Split-brain patients

Research by Michael Gazzaniga and Roger Wolcott Sperry in the 1960s on split-brain patients led to an even greater understanding of functional laterality. Split-brain patients are patients who have undergone corpus callosotomy (usually as a treatment for severe epilepsy), a severing of a large part of the corpus callosum. The corpus callosum connects the two hemispheres of the brain and allows them to communicate. When these connections are cut, the two halves of the brain have a reduced capacity to communicate with each other. This led to many interesting behavioral phenomena that allowed Gazzaniga and Sperry to study the contributions of each hemisphere to various cognitive and perceptual processes. One of their main findings was that the right hemisphere was capable of rudimentary language processing, but often has no lexical or grammatical abilities.[18] Eran Zaidel, however, also studied such patients and found some evidence for the right hemisphere having at least some syntactic ability.

For example: Patients with brain damage from surgery, stroke or infection sometimes develop a syndrome in which they can feel sensations in their hand, but they don't feel responsible for nor able to control its movements. In patients with a corpus callostomy, alien hand syndrome most often manifests as uncontrolled but purposeful movements of the nondominant hand.[citation needed]

Exaggeration

Hines states that the research on brain lateralization is valid as a research program, though commercial promoters have applied it to promote subjects and products far outside the implications of the research.[19] For example, the implications of the research have no bearing on psychological interventions such as EMDR and neurolinguistic programming,[20] brain training equipment, or management training.[21]

Nonhuman brain lateralization

Specialization of the two hemispheres is general in vertebrates including fish, frogs, reptiles, birds and mammals with the left hemisphere being specialized to categorize information and control everyday, routine behavior, with the right hemisphere responsible for responses to novel events and behavior in emergencies including the expression of intense emotions. An example of a routine left hemisphere behavior is feeding behavior whereas as a right hemisphere is escape from predators and attacks from conspecifics.[22]

See also

References

  1. ^ Westen et al. 2006 "Psychology: Australian and New Zealand edition" John Wiley p.107
  2. ^ Toga AW, Thompson PM. (2003). Mapping brain asymmetry. Nat Rev Neurosci. 4(1):37–48.PMID 12511860
  3. ^ "Girl recovers after half of brain removed" (Document). 9 News. March 26, 2010. {{cite document}}: Unknown parameter |url= ignored (help)
  4. ^ Goswami U (2006), “Neuroscience and education: from research to practice?” Nat Rev Neurosci 7(5):406–11 doi: 10.1038/nrn1907 pmid: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16607400
  5. ^ a b Taylor, Insep and Taylor, M. Martin (1990) "Psycholinguistics: Learning and using Language". page 362
  6. ^ Regarding different languages: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-11181457
  7. ^ Left/Right Processing.
  8. ^ Dr. C. George Boeree. Speech and the Brain.
  9. ^ Levy LM, Reis IL, Grafman. J. Metabolic abnormalities detected by 1H-MRS in dyscalculia and dysgraphia. Neurology. 1999 Aug 11;53(3):639–41. PMID 10449137
  10. ^ Dyscalculia Symptoms
  11. ^ Ross ED, Monnot M (2008). "Neurology of affective prosody and its functional-anatomic organization in right hemisphere". Brain Lang. 104 (1): 51–74. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.007. PMID 17537499. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. ^ George MS, Parekh PI, Rosinsky N, Ketter TA, Kimbrell TA, Heilman KM, Herscovitch P, Post RM (1996). "Understanding Emotional Prosody Activates Right Hemisphere Regions". Arch Neurol. 53 (7): 665–670. PMID 8929174. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ Elkhonon Goldberg.(2009) The New Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes in a Complex World, NY: Oxford University Press; paperback. ISBN 978-0195329407
  14. ^ a b c Dehaene S, Spelke E, Pinel P, Stanescu R, Tsivkin S. Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science. 1999 May 7;284(5416):970–4. PMID 10320379.
  15. ^ a b c Stanislas Dehaene, Manuela Piazza, Philippe Pinel, and Laurent Cohen. Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20:487–506
  16. ^ a b Taylor, Insep, and Taylor, M. Martin (1990) "Psycholinguistics: Learning and using Language". p. 367
  17. ^ Knecht S, Dräger B, Deppe M, Bobe L, Lohmann H, Flöel A, Ringelstein EB, Henningsen H. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain. 2000;123(12):2512–2518. http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/123/12/2512
  18. ^ Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessel T. Principles of Neural Science. 4th ed. p1182. New York: McGraw–Hill; 2000. ISBN 0-8385-7701-6
  19. ^ Hines, Terence (1987) Left Brain/Right Brain Mythology and Implications for Management and Training, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, October 1987
  20. ^ Drenth, J. D. (2003) Growing anti-intellectualism in Europe; a menace to science, Studia Psychologica
  21. ^ Sala, (1999). Mind Myths: Exploring Popular Assumptions about the Mind and Brain. New York; Wiley
  22. ^ Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ. (2005). Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav Brain Sci.28(4):575–89. PMID 16209828

Sources

Further reading

Bookmarks