MDPI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
MDPI AG
Aktiengesellschaft (publicly held corporation)
Industry Open access journals, Chemical library
Founded 2008
Headquarters Basel, Switzerland
Key people
Shu-Kun Lin
Website www.mdpi.com

MDPI is an acronym shared by two related organizations nominally headquartered in Basel (Switzerland) and with larger offices in Beijing and Wuhan (China): Molecular Diversity Preservation International, an organization whose stated aim is to "preserve chemical samples for research," and MDPI AG (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute), a publisher of peer-reviewed open-access journals.[1][2]

Molecular Diversity Preservation International[edit]

Chemical samples[edit]

Molecular Diversity Preservation International was founded and registered as a non-profit association (Verein) by Shu-Kun Lin and Benoit R. Turin in Basel in 1996 to enable the deposit and exchange of rare molecular and biomolecular research samples.[3] The goal was to preserve the diversity of chemical compounds through the collection and storage of samples that could be made available to the scientific community for research purposes.[4] This collection of samples was permanently transferred to the MDPI Sustainability Foundation in 2013, and Molecular Diversity Preservation International was dissolved. The collection of chemical samples is now operated by Molmall Sarl on behalf of the MDPI Sustainability Foundation.[5]

Journals[edit]

The journal Molecules was established in 1996 in collaboration with Springer-Verlag (now Springer Science+Business Media) in order to document the chemical samples of the MDPI collection. Several other journals were established by the MDPI Verein, including Entropy (1999), the International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2000), Sensors (2001), Marine Drugs (2003) and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2004). The publisher MDPI AG was spun off from MDPI Verein in 2010.

Conferences[edit]

MDPI Verein co-organized several academic conferences, including the International Symposium on Frontiers in Molecular Science. It also runs virtual conferences, such as the Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry, which was started in 1997. In 2010 MDPI launched the platform Sciforum.net to host virtual conferences. In 2014, various virtual conferences were hosted in the areas of synthetic organic chemistry, material sciences, sensors and sustainability. In 2015, MDPI co-organized two physical conferences with and at the University of Basel, the 4th Internationational Symposium on Sensor Science and the 5th World Sustainability Forum. Since 2015, scholars can organize their own conference for free on the Sciforum platform.

MDPI AG (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)[edit]

Development[edit]

MDPI AG, a publisher of open-access journals, was spun off from the Molecular Diversity Preservation International organization. It was formally registered by Shu-Kun Lin and Dietrich Rordorf in May 2010 in Basel, Switzerland, and maintains three offshore editorial offices in China.[3] MDPI relies primarily on article processing charges to cover the costs of editorial quality control and production of articles.[6] Over seventy universities and institutes have joined the MDPI Institutional Membership Program, set up in the fourth quarter of 2013; authors from these organizations pay reduced article processing charges.[7] MDPI is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM), and the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA).[8][9][10]

Journals[edit]

MDPI currently publishes more than 130 peer-reviewed scientific journals. As of August 2015, 28 journals have been accepted by Thomson Reuters for coverage in Web of Science[11] and 25 life science-related journals are archived in PubMed Central.[12] 45 journals are covered by Scopus and a further 13 by Compendex (EI). A further 32 Journals have been accepted by Thomson Reuters for coverage in the Emerging Sources Citation Index.[13] All articles published by MDPI since 2008 are released under the CC-BY Creative Commons license[14] and are archived with the Swiss National Library.[15]

Controversial articles[edit]

In December 2011, the MDPI journal Life published Erik D. Andrulis' theoretical paper, Theory of the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life, aiming at presenting a framework to explain life.[16] It attracted coverage by the popular science and technology magazines Ars Technica and Popular Science, which characterized it as "crazy"[17] and "hilarious".[18] A member of the editorial board of Life resigned in response.[18][19] Publisher Lin defended the journal's editorial process, saying that the paper had been revised following lengthy reviews by two faculty members from institutions different from the author's.[20]

In 2013, another MDPI journal, Entropy, published a review paper claiming glyphosate may be the most important factor in the development of obesity, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, cancer, and infertility.[21] The paper itself does not contain any primary research results.[21] It was criticized as pseudo-science by the popular science magazine Discover.[22] With regard to the same controversial study, Jeffrey Beall has rhetorically asked, "Will MDPI publish anything for money?".[23]

When publishers like MDPI disseminate research by science activists like Stephanie Seneff and her co-authors, I think it’s fair to question the credibility of all the research that MDPI publishes. Will MDPI publish anything for money?

A third instance of controversial publications is documented in the Australian paradox.

MDPI has published a statement in December 2013 as a response and defense on publishing controversial papers.[24]

Inclusion in Beall's list[edit]

MDPI was included on Jeffrey Beall's list of predatory open access publishing companies as of February 2014,[25] and removed in October 2015 following a successful appeal.[25] Following Beall's criticism of MDPI, the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) conducted an investigation in April 2014 and concluded that MDPI meets the OASPA Membership Criteria, stating that "Based on our findings we feel satisfied that MDPI continue to meet the OASPA Membership Criteria".[26]

Jeffrey Beall concern was that "MDPI's warehouse journals contain hundreds of lightly-reviewed articles that are mainly written and published for promotion and tenure purposes rather than to communicate science."[27] Beall also claimed that MDPI used email spam to solicit manuscripts.[28]

MDPI characterized Beall's comments as "an incompetent general critique" and alleged that the inclusion of MDPI on his list was motivated by a hostility towards open access publishing in general, noting that he had recently published a commentary on that theme.[29][30] Peter Murray-Rust, a chemist currently working at the University of Cambridge and an editorial board member of the-yet-to-be-started MDPI journal Data,[31] criticized Beall's critique of MDPI as being "irresponsible" and lacking evidence.[32] Nevertheless, Beall maintained MDPI on his list, criticizing the company for publishing obvious pseudoscience articles.[33]

One of its journals had been targeted in the Who's Afraid of Peer Review? sting operation and rejected the fake paper.[34] In 2014, MDPI's Life journal started featuring open peer review[35] (optional, at the authors' discretion),[36] which has been advocated as a transparency measure to combat predatory journals.[37]

Further critique was raised by Martin Haspelmath who argues that the publication model employed by MDPI

"creates a strong incentive to create journals and book imprints that function like 'vanity presses,' allowing authors to publish their low-quality work without significant risk of rejection. [...] For example, I recently heard of two Chinese companies that are publishing a large number of open-access journals, some of them in my field of linguistics: Wuhan-based SCIRP ([...] over 250 journals) and Beijing-based MDPI ([...] over 120 journals). The business model here is to start a large number of new journals and to hope that some of them will succeed and bring profit. For example, MDPI's journal Languages does not even have an editor yet. This is of course reminiscent of the business model of spam e-mail, and in fact, some observers have warned of the danger of 'predatory journals.'"[38]

In response to Martin Haspelmath opinion article, MDPI published a commentary in the same journal to correct a number of points.[39]

Nobelists[edit]

Among the reasons Beall gave for adding MDPI to his list of questionable publishers was that the company "...claims that several Nobel Laureates serve on its editorial boards, but one investigation found that they didn’t realize they were listed."[40] As evidence for this particular accusation, Beall pointed[41] to a news story run by eCampus News.[42] The original reporter later issued a correction[43] and the newspiece was modified and appended with the following notice:[44]

An earlier version of this article stated that Nobel Prize-winning geneticist Mario Capecchi was not aware he was listed as a member of the editorial board for the MDPI journal Biomolecules. At the time, Capecchi’s assistant, Lorene Stitzer, told eCampus News that “he was not aware of the fact that he had been included on the listing.” After being contacted by MDPI, Stitzer now says Capecchi is in fact aware of being an honorary board member. eCampus News regrets the error.

With regard to Beall's accusation about Nobel laureate Mario Capecchi not being aware that he was on the editorial board of the journal Biomolecules, MDPI posted a response stating that "the Editor-in-Chief of Biomolecules obtained a written confirmation from Professor Cappechi that he was indeed aware of his membership"; copies of such correspondence have been posted as well.[45] MDPI has compiled and posted emails claiming to document the acceptance by the following Nobelists as members of the board in MDPI journals: Robert F. Curl, Richard R. Ernst, Jerome Karle, Harold Kroto, Yuan-Tseh Lee, Rudolph A. Marcus, Eric S. Maskin, Steven Weinberg, and Kurt Wüthrich.[45]

The uncorrected story has been picked up other media outlets, such as Veja, the leading weekly news magazine in Brazil.[46]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "What is MDPI.com?". Retrieved 2014-03-17. 
  2. ^ "Molecular Diversity Preservation International". Retrieved 2014-03-17.  Home page
  3. ^ a b "History of MDPI". Retrieved 2014-03-17. 
  4. ^ "Chemical Museum and Samples Exchange". Retrieved 2011-07-24. 
  5. ^ "MolMall About us". MolMall. 2013. Retrieved 9 February 2014. 
  6. ^ "Does MDPI Offer Any Discounts or Waivers of the Article Processing Charges (APCs)?". MDPI. Retrieved 18 March 2014. 
  7. ^ "Membership Institutes". MDPI. Retrieved 18 March 2014. 
  8. ^ "COPE Members". Retrieved 2015-08-20. 
  9. ^ "STM Members". Retrieved 2015-08-20. 
  10. ^ "OASPA Members". Retrieved 2015-08-20. 
  11. ^ "Journals A-Z indexed by the Science Citation Index Expanded". MDPI. Retrieved 2014-09-16. 
  12. ^ "Journals A-Z indexed in PubMed". MDPI. Retrieved 2014-07-30. 
  13. ^ "ESCI Announcement". Retrieved 2015-11-20. 
  14. ^ "MDPI Open Access Information and Policy". MDPI. 
  15. ^ "About MDPI". MDPI. 
  16. ^ Andrulis, Erik D. (2011). "Theory of the Origin, Evolution, and Nature of Life". Life 2 (1): 1–105. doi:10.3390/life2010001. 
  17. ^ Timmer, John. "How the craziest f#@!ing "theory of everything" got published and promoted". Ars Technica. Retrieved 17 January 2014. 
  18. ^ a b Nosowitz, Dan. "Hilarious "Theory of Everything" Paper Provokes Kerfuffle". Popular Science. Retrieved 17 January 2014. 
  19. ^ Zimmer, Carl. "Life turned upside down". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 17 January 2014. 
  20. ^ Lin, Shu-Kun (2012). "Publication of Controversial Papers in Life". Life 2 (1): 213–214. doi:10.3390/life2010213. 
  21. ^ a b Samsel, Anthony; Stephanie Seneff. "Glyphosate's Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases". Entropy. doi:10.3390/e15041416. 
  22. ^ Kloor, Keith. "When Media Uncritically Cover Pseudoscience". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 17 January 2014. 
  23. ^ Beall, Jeffrey. "Anti-Roundup (Glyphosate) Researchers Use Easy OA Journals to Spread their Views". Scholarly Open Access. Retrieved 8 January 2015. 
  24. ^ "Controversial Articles". MDPI. December 2013. Retrieved 9 February 2014. 
  25. ^ a b Jeffrey Beall (18 February 2014), Chinese Publisher MDPI Added to List of Questionable Publishers, Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing
  26. ^ "Conclusions from OASPA Membership Committee Investigation into MDPI". Retrieved 14 April 2014. 
  27. ^ "Chinese Publisher MDPI Added to List of Questionable Publishers". Retrieved 10 March 2014. 
  28. ^ Jeffrey Beall (11 June 2015), Guest Editing a Special Issue with MDPI: Evidences of Questionable Actions by the Publisher, Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing
  29. ^ Beall, Jeffrey (2013). "The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access". tripleC 11 (2): 589–597. 
  30. ^ "Response to Mr. Jeffrey Beall's Repeated Attacks on MDPI". MDPI. February 2014. Retrieved 13 March 2014. 
  31. ^ "Data — Editors". Retrieved 17 March 2014. 
  32. ^ Murray-Rust, Peter (2014-02-18). "Beall’s criticism of MDPI lacks evidence and is irresponsible". 
  33. ^ Jeffrey Beall. "More Pseudo-Science from Swiss / Chinese Publisher MDPI". Scholarly Open Access. Retrieved 2015-08-31. 
  34. ^ "Data and Documents". 
  35. ^ Rampelotto, P. (2014). "Opening up Peer Review in Life: Towards a Transparent and Reliable Process". Life 4 (2): 225. doi:10.3390/life4020225. 
  36. ^ "Life — Instructions for Authors § Editorial Procedures and Peer-Review". 
  37. ^ "Is this peer reviewed? Predatory journals and the transparency of peer review". 
  38. ^ Haspelmath M (2013). Why open-access publication should be nonprofit—a view from the field of theoretical language science. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 7:57. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00057
  39. ^ Rittman M (2015). Commentary: Why open-access publication should be nonprofit—a view from the field of theoretical language science. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9:201. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00201
  40. ^ Beall, Jeffrey (18 February 2014). "Chinese Publisher MDPI Added to List of Questionable Publishers". Scholarly Open Access. Retrieved 31 January 2015. 
  41. ^ "Chinese Publisher MDPI Added to List of Questionable Publishers". Scholarly Open Access. 
  42. ^ "Open access critic has major publisher in crosshairs - eCampus News". eCampus News. 
  43. ^ "Jake New on Twitter". Twitter. 
  44. ^ "Open access critic has major publisher in crosshairs - Page 3 of 3 - eCampus News". eCampus News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2014. 
  45. ^ a b "Response to Mr. Jeffrey Beall’s Repeated Attacks on MDPI". MDPI. 24 February 2014. Retrieved 31 January 2015. 
  46. ^ Fernanda Allegretti (6 December 2014). "Uma praga da ciência brasileira: os artigos de segunda". VEJA.com. 

External links[edit]