Jump to content

Magnetoreception: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

22 September 2024

19 September 2024

18 September 2024

  • curprev 21:1921:19, 18 September 2024 Ashcanpete talk contribs 59,508 bytes −527 Proposed mechanisms: Again, that paper doesn't apply to night migration. It shows the "active state" responds to magnetism in the absence of light, but that active state only lasts for minutes before light is needed to "reactivate" it. In other words, the actual magnetosensing isn't light-dependent directly, but light is still required to create the species of cryptochrome that responds to magnetism, and that species lasts nowhere near long enough in the dark to work during night migration. undo Tag: Manual revert
  • curprev 21:1721:17, 18 September 2024 Ashcanpete talk contribs m 60,035 bytes +527 Undid revision 1246421608 by 128.135.40.205 (talk) So i can make same revision with signature. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 21:1121:11, 18 September 2024 128.135.40.205 talk 59,508 bytes −527 Proposed mechanisms: Again, that paper doesn't apply to night migration. It shows the "active state" responds to magnetism in the absence of light, but that active state only lasts for minutes before light is needed to "reactivate" it. In other words, the actual magnetosensing isn't light-dependent directly, but light is still required to create the species of crytochrome that response to magnetism, and that species lasts nowhere near long enough in the dark to work during night migration. undo Tag: Reverted

7 August 2024

6 August 2024

11 June 2024

20 May 2024

16 May 2024

15 May 2024

3 April 2024

2 April 2024

3 February 2024

7 January 2024

4 January 2024

  • curprev 18:4118:41, 4 January 2024 Chiswick Chap talk contribs 58,183 bytes +707 thanks, but a) we need the citation for other text b) you agree it's correct, so c) I've added an explanatory gloss about compass-needle forces undo
  • curprev 17:2917:29, 4 January 2024 107.122.85.6 talk 57,476 bytes −594 Removed correct but misleading statement. To an unfamiliar reader "only plausible way to induce chemical change" implies that this is the only way magnetoreception could occur biologically. This is not the case, chemical changes are required for chemo detection of magnetic fields, but iron-based methods use force based detection if magnetic fields. Both sea turtles and lobsters have been show to use magnetize particle based magnetoreception, based on susceptiblity to magnetic pulse disruption. undo Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

2 January 2024

1 January 2024

15 December 2023

6 December 2023

3 December 2023

27 November 2023

18 August 2023

13 August 2023

27 July 2023

9 July 2023

14 June 2023

12 June 2023

29 April 2023

1 April 2023

10 March 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)