Jump to content

Mencius (book)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Citizen Canine (talk | contribs) at 14:26, 3 October 2018 (MOS:CENTURY). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Mèngzǐ
孟子
Early-13th-century Mencius printing held in National Palace Museum
AuthorMencius
LanguageChinese
GenrePhilosophy
Publication date
c. 300 BC
Publication placeChina
Mencius
"Mencius (Mengzi)" in seal script (top) and regular (bottom) Chinese characters
Chinese孟子
Literal meaning"[The Writings of] Master Meng"
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinMèngzǐ
Gwoyeu RomatzyhMenqtzyy
Wade–GilesMeng4-tzu3
IPA[mə̂ŋ.tsɨ̀]
Wu
RomanizationMan-tsy
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationMaahng-jí
JyutpingMaang6-zi2
IPA[maŋ˨.tsi˧˥]
Southern Min
Hokkien POJBēng-chú
Tâi-lôBēng-tsú
Middle Chinese
Middle Chinesemæ̀ng dzí
Old Chinese
Baxter–Sagart (2014)*mˤrang-s tsəʔ

The Mencius (Chinese: 孟子; Old Chinese: *mˤraŋ-s tsəʔ; pinyin: Mèngzǐ) is a collection of anecdotes and conversations of the Confucian thinker and philosopher Mencius on topics in moral and political philosophy, often between Mencius and the rulers of the various Warring States. Mencius was a disciple of one of the students of Zisi, a grandson of Confucius, and the Mencius records his travels and audiences with the various rulers of the Warring States period, his students, and his other contemporaries.[1][2] A number of linguistic and textual clues suggest that the text was not written by Mencius himself but by his disciples,[1] probably during the late 4th century BC.[3]

The Mencius comprises seven chapters, each divided into two halves, with alternating short sayings and extensive dialogues on specific philosophical arguments.[4] Its fundamental positions, such as Mencius' famous argument in chapter 6A that human nature is inherently good, are usually presented as conversations between Mencius and contemporaneous thinkers, while arguments on specific issues usually appear in records of his advice and counsel to various rulers.[4] His argument that inborn potential tends towards virtue contrasts with the position of contemporary figure Yang Zhu who argued that that human nature is motivated by self interest. [5]

The Mencius was one of the most important texts of early Confucianism, and represents a notable advance over the Analects of Confucius (Lunyu 論語) in terms of sophistication of argument.[2] Notwithstanding its early importance to Confucianism, the Mencius was not canonized as one of the Chinese Classics until over 1,000 years later in Song dynasty Neo-Confucianism.[2] [6]

Selected translations

  • Legge, James (1861). The Works of Mencius. The Chinese Classics, vol. 2. Reprinted (1895), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Template:Fr icon Couvreur, Séraphin (1895). Oeuvres de Meng Tzeu (Works of Mengzi), in Les Quatres Livres. Ho Kien Fou: Mission Catholique.
  • Template:De icon Wilhelm, Richard (1916). Mong Dsi (Mengzi). Jena: Eugen Diderichs.
  • Lyall, Leonard A. (1932). Mencius. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
  • Ware, James R. (1960). The Sayings of Mencius. New York: Mentor Books.
  • Dobson, W. A. C. H. (1963). Mencius, A New Translation Arranged and Annotated for the General Reader. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Lau, D. C. (1970). Mencius. London: Penguin Books.
  • Lau, D. C. (2003). Mencius (New Bilingual Edition). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Van Norden, Bryan (2008). Mencius: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Bloom, Irene (2009). Mencius. New York: Columbia University Press.

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b Lau (1993), p. 331.
  2. ^ a b c Shih & Knechtges (2010), p. 668.
  3. ^ Kern (2010), p. 69.
  4. ^ a b Kern (2010), p. 70.
  5. ^ denecke (2017), p. 210.
  6. ^ fuller (2004), p. 175.

Works cited

  • Bloom, Irene (1999). "The Evolution of the Confucian Tradition in Antiquity — Mencius". In de Bary, Wm. Theodore; Bloom, Irene (eds.). Sources of Chinese Tradition, Vol. 1: From Earliest Times to 1600 (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 114–34. ISBN 978-0-231-10939-0. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Denecke, Wiebke (2017). "Chapter 14: Masters (Zi 子)". In Denecke, Wiebke; Li, Wai-Yee; Tian, Xiaofei (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Classical Chinese Literature (1000 BCE-900CE). New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 201–218.
  • Fuller, Michael A (2004). An Introduction to Literary Chinese. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Asia Center: Distributed by Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-01726-9.
  • Kern, Martin (2010). "Early Chinese literature, Beginnings through Western Han". In Owen, Stephen (ed.). The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature, Volume I: To 1375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–115. ISBN 978-0-521-85558-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Lau, D. C. (1993). "Meng tzu 孟子 (Mencius)". In Loewe, Michael (ed.). Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographical Guide. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China; Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley. pp. 331–335. ISBN 1-55729-043-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |editorlink= ignored (|editor-link= suggested) (help)
  • Shih, Hsiang-lin; Knechtges, David R. (2010). "Mengzi 孟子". In Knechtges, David R.; Chang, Taiping (eds.). Ancient and Early Medieval Chinese Literature: A Reference Guide, Part One. Leiden: Brill. pp. 668–671. ISBN 978-90-04-19127-3. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Nivison, David Shepherd (1999). "The Classical Philosophical Writings". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward (eds.). The Cambridge History of Ancient China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 745–812. ISBN 0-521-47030-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)