Jump to content

SS Robin Moor

Edit links
Coordinates: 6°10′N 25°40′W / 6.167°N 25.667°W / 6.167; -25.667
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from SS Shetucket)

History
United States
Name
  • 1919: Shetucket
  • 1919–28: Nobles
  • 1928–41: Exmoor
  • 1941: Robin Moor
Owner
Port of registryNew York
BuilderAmerican International Shipbuilding Corp., Hog Island
Yard number536
Launched23 August 1919
CompletedOctober 1919
Identification
FateTorpedoed and shelled 21 May 1941
General characteristics
Class and typeDesign 1022 cargo ship
Tonnage4,999 GRT, 3,057 NRT
Length390.0 ft (118.9 m)
Beam54.2 ft (16.5 m)
Depth27.6 ft (8.4 m)
Decks2
Installed power600 NHP
Propulsionsteam turbine
Speed11.5 knots (21 km/h)
Crew46

SS Robin Moor was a United States cargo steamship that was built in 1919 and sunk by a German U-boat in May 1941, several months before the US entered World War II.

The U-boat allowed the passengers and crew to launch her lifeboats and abandon ship with no loss of life. However, the sinking of a neutral ship in an area considered until then to be relatively safe from U-boats, and the plight of her crew and passengers, caused a political incident in the United States.

The attack caused many to question the motives of U-69's commander, Jost Metzler as Hitler himself, preparing for his June 1941 invasion of Russia, had expressly ordered his Navy chief, Admiral Erich Raeder: "...in the next weeks all attacks on naval vessels in the closed area should cease..." Hitler did not wish to provoke America into joining with Britain in its fight against Germany.[citation needed]

Building, names, and details

[edit]

The ship was a Design 1022 Hog Islander, built by the American International Shipbuilding Corporation at its emergency shipbuilding yard at Hog Island, just outside Philadelphia. She was yard number 536, laid down for the US Government as Shetucket, but completed in October 1919 for the United States Shipping Board as Nobles. In 1928 American Export Lines bought her and renamed her Exmoor. In 1940 the Seas Shipping Co. Inc., of New York, bought her and renamed her Robin Moor.[1]

The ship had a registered length of 390.0 ft (118.9 m), beam of 54.2 ft (16.5 m) and depth of 27.6 ft (8.4 m), and her tonnages were 4,999 GRT and 3,057 NRT. She had a single propeller, driven by a steam turbine via double reduction gearing. Her turbine was rated at 600 NHP and gave her a speed of 11.5 knots (21 km/h). Her US official number was 218960. Until 1933 her code letters were LTBR,[2] and from 1934 her wireless telegraph call sign was KJJU.[3]

Sinking

[edit]
Painting of Robin Moor being sunk

In May 1941 Robin Moor, crewed by nine officers and 29 men, was sailing unescorted with eight passengers and a commercial cargo from New York to Mozambique via South Africa. Her cargo included "items of every conceivable description that would go into a general cargo", including over 450 autos and trucks, steel rails, tools, agricultural chemicals, over 48,000 U.S. gallons (180,000 L) of lubricant in drums, cases of shotgun shells, and a few .22 caliber rifles destined for sporting goods stores.[4]

At 0525 hrs on 21 May, German submarine U-69 stopped Robin Moor in the tropical Atlantic 750 miles west of Freetown, Sierra Leone.[5] Although Robin Moor was registered in a neutral country, the U-boat crew told her First Officer they had decided to "let us have it."[6]

After a brief period for the ship's crew and passengers to board and launch her four lifeboats, U-69 fired a torpedo that hit Robin Moor amidships. She began to sink only slowly, so 40 minutes later U-69 surfaced and fired 39 rounds from her 88mm deck gun. After another 17 minutes Robin Moor sank. Wooden crates containing some of her deck cargo floated free, so U-69 fired on them with her 20mm anti-aircraft guns.[5]

Captain Edward Myers waving Goodbye to the German submarine after his ship sank and the crew had been released, photo taken from U-69 by her crew

After the ship sank, U-69's crew pulled up to Captain Edward Myers' lifeboat, and gave him four tins of pressed black bread, two tins of butter, some Cognac, and bandages,[5] and claimed that had sunk Robin Moor because she was carrying supplies to Germany's enemy.[7] The lifeboat passengers found the black bread "too tough to eat".[8]

Rescue

[edit]

When Robin Moor was stopped, U-69 forbade her crew to touch their wireless, but after the sinking, U-69's captain, Jost Metzler, reportedly promised the survivors he would radio their position.[8] The captain kept the lifeboats near Robin Moor's position for 24 hours, then navigated towards St Paul's Rocks or the Brazilian coast with all four lifeboats bound together.[9] The captain separated the lifeboats on 26 May as his plan was not working.[10]

After 18 days the Brazilian merchant ship Osório rescued the lifeboat containing the captain and 10 others on 8 June. The news was relayed by radio from Osório to the Brazilian ship Lages, then the US merchant ship Deer Lodge, then RCA and finally Washington, D.C.[11] Osório then went to Pernambuco where Brazil allowed the US ambassador to interview the rescued survivors first. On 14 June, the US Maritime Commission asked ships in the area of Robin Moor's sinking to look out for survivors, though The New York Times stated "Little or no hope is held out" for the remainder of the survivors.[10][12]

On 13 June, two Connecticut residents independently stated they heard short-wave broadcasts from Italy that a submarine had docked at an Italian port carrying eight survivors from Robin Moor.[13] This proved to be unfounded. The occupants of the rescued lifeboat presumed that the remaining crew and passengers were lost, but the British Ellerman Lines cargo ship City of Wellington found them on 2 June. She was sailing under radio silence, but was able to receive the news that the captain's party was rescued and those aboard City of Wellington were presumed dead. On 18 June City of Wellington landed survivors at Cape Town in South Africa, and their rescue immediately became news.[14]

All of the crew and passengers were rescued. The contingent that had been landed in Brazil returned to the US aboard Delargentino.[8]

Aftermath

[edit]
Leo Waalen, FBI file photo

Isolationist United States Senator Gerald Nye, blaming Britain for sinking Robin Moor, said he would be "very much surprised if a German submarine had done it because it would be to their disadvantage" to torpedo the ship.[14][better source needed][15]

On 11 June, The New York Times, reporting several different rumors pointing to German blame, also said there may have been Italian submarines in the area, and quoted a German source that said the reports were "confusing, unclear, and contradictory."[16]

Nye withdrew his comment on 14 June 1941, stating "The evidence that the Robin Moor was sunk by a German submarine is too complete to permit my declaration of yesterday noon, to the effect that the boat might have been sunk by Britain, to stand", through the America First Committee.[17]

President Roosevelt later stated in a message to Congress regarding the sinking that the survivors were "accidentally discovered and rescued by friendly vessels. This chance rescue does not lessen the brutality of casting the boats adrift in mid-ocean."[18] Senator Theodore F. Green (D-RI) stated "I don't think the sinking will have any more effect than the sinking of The Panay by Japan. An act of war is bilateral, not unilateral." Also speaking about the Panay incident, Representative Melvin J. Maas (R-MN) said "Japan... not only failed to rescue survivors but machine-gunned them afterward and we didn't go to war."

Senator Pat McCarran said "It is nothing to get excited about". Senator Ralph O. Brewster said "The effect of the sinking depends on the attitude of Germany — whether it is a determined policy or an accident". U.S. Representative John William McCormack said "It was very unfortunate but there is no reason now to get unnecessarily excited over this incident". Representative Andrew J. May, chairman of the House Military Affairs Committee, said "We ought to convoy with battleships and let the shooting start and see who shoots first and who can outshoot".[10]

While Roosevelt responded to the sinking with strong words, the strength of his administration's actions was disputed. His message to Congress described Germany's decision to sink the ship as "a disclosure of policy as well as an example of method." His message concluded:

In brief, we must take the sinking of the Robin Moor as a warning to the United States not to resist the Nazi movement of world conquest. It is a warning that the United States may use the high seas of the world only with Nazi consent. Were we to yield on this we would inevitably submit to world domination at the hands of the present leaders of the German Reich. We are not yielding and we do not propose to yield.

— Franklin D. Roosevelt[18]

German assets were frozen on 12 June, then on 14 June[14] the State Department required Germany and Italy to close all of their consulates in the United States except for their embassies, prompting Germany to issue the same directive to the United States in return. The US also demanded damages and reparations from Germany, without success.[citation needed]

In Congress, isolationist Senator Burton K. Wheeler (D-MT) claimed that 70% of the ship's cargo constituted the kind of materials meeting both German and British standards for contraband, defended the legality of Germany's right to destroy her, and characterised Roosevelt's message as an effort to bring the United States into the war. Others, such as Senator Claude Pepper, urged their colleagues to require the arming of merchant vessels.[citation needed]

In October 1941, federal prosecutors in the espionage case against a group of 33 defendants known as the "Duquesne Spy Ring" adduced testimony that Leo Waalen, one of the 14 accused men who had pled not guilty, had submitted the sailing date of the Robin Moor for radio transmission to Germany, five days before the ship began her final voyage. Waalen and the others were found guilty on 13 December 1941.

In literature

[edit]
How To Abandon Ship: National World War II Museum, New Orleans

John J. Banigan, Third Officer of Robin Moor, and New York writer Phil Richards went on to write How to Abandon Ship (ISBN 0870333887). The book articulates Naval experience and serves as a detailed survival guide for sailors in a wartime environment.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Claes, Johnny; Allen, Tony. "SS Robin Moor (+1941)". Wrecksite.eu. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  2. ^ "Steamers & Motorships". Lloyd's Register of Shipping (PDF). Vol. II. London: Lloyd's Register of Shipping. 1930. Retrieved 5 July 2021 – via Southampton City Council.
  3. ^ "Steamers & Motorships". Lloyd's Register of Shipping (PDF). Vol. II. London: Lloyd's Register of Shipping. 1934. Retrieved 5 July 2021 – via Southampton City Council.
  4. ^ "Robin Moor Cargo Analyzed By Line: Company Head Says There Was Not an Item to Which The Reich Could Rightfully Object". The New York Times. 14 June 1941. p. 3. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  5. ^ a b c Helgason, Guðmundur. "Robin Moor". uboat.net. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
  6. ^ "Metzler-Jost-Sehrohr-Suedwaerts".
  7. ^ "Metzler-Jost-Sehrohr-Suedwaerts".
  8. ^ a b c "Armed German Seized Ship Radio, Robin Moor's Chief Cook Declares". The New York Times. Associated Press. 14 June 1941.
  9. ^ "Text of Consul's Report on Robin Moor". The New York Times. 13 June 1941. p. 6. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  10. ^ a b c "Nazis 'Undoubtedly' Sank the Robin Moor, Aware She Was a U.S. Ship, Consul Says". The New York Times. 13 June 1941. p. 6. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  11. ^ "U.S. Ship Sunk in Atlantic, Reported Victim of U-Boat". The New York Times. 10 June 1941. pp. 1, 7.
  12. ^ "Robin Moor Raid is held violation". The New York Times. 14 June 1941. p. 1,3.
  13. ^ "Reports More Survivors". The New York Times. 13 June 1941. p. 6.
  14. ^ a b c Schaffer, Amanda (28 May 2016). "Lost at Sea on the Brink of the Second World War". The New Yorker. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  15. ^ "Nye Would Study Sinking Evidence". The New York Times. 13 June 1941.
  16. ^ "Roosevelt Urges Delayed Judgment on Sinking of Ship". The New York Times. 11 June 1941. pp. 1, 5. Retrieved 7 June 2016.
  17. ^ "Nye Withdraws Comment: Says Evidence now shows that Nazis sank Robin Moor". The New York Times. 14 June 1941. p. 2.
  18. ^ a b John T. Woolley and Gerhard Peters, The American Presidency Project "66 - Message to Congress on the Sinking of the Robin Moor". University of California. 20 June 1941. Archived from the original on 7 August 2016. Retrieved 7 June 2016.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Associated Press, Alleged Spy Accused of Tip on Robin Moor, Salamanca Republican Press, 1941-10-18, at 10, available at NewspaperArchive.com.
  • Stewart Atkins, "Robin Moor Survivor, on Visit in County, tells a Vivid Story of Incident", Gastonia Daily Gazette, 1 August 1941, at page a-1
  • George Haber, Outrageous and Indefensible: The Sinking of the SS Robin Moor, 1941 Kings Point, NY: American Merchant Marine Museum, 2016; ISBN 978-0-9975687-0-7.
  • Amanda Schaffer, "Lost At Sea On The Brink Of The Second World War", The New Yorker; accessed 12 December 2016.
  • United Press, "Reparations held unlikely", Oakland Tribune, 22 June 1941 at page 1, available at NewspaperArchive.com.
  • United Press, "Roosevelt Supporters Urge Arming of US Merchant Vessels", Oakland Tribune, 22 June 1941 at page 4.

6°10′N 25°40′W / 6.167°N 25.667°W / 6.167; -25.667

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SS_Robin_Moor&oldid=1251189272"