Jump to content

Talk:2010 Korean Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Circuit Map

[edit]

Hey guys,

The circuit map needs to be re-drawn. There have been some major changes in its construction since the last map was put up. I'd do it myself, but I'm hopeless at Photoshop; I can barely manage MS Paint. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 02:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A map of the newly designed circuit has been put up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Linkyblinky (talkcontribs) 06:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Korean Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 05:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'm glad to review this. I will be on vacation until the 12th. I'm taking a printed out version of the article with me so that I'll be able to give you my thoughts as soon as I get back. Zwerg Nase (talk) 05:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

A very good article on this race. I made some minor changes myself. What's left is very little:

  • Lead: I feel that the sentence '#In the World Constructors' Championship, Red Bull retained their lead but were reduced by McLaren, who were thirty-five points behind. sounds weird. Can Red Bull be reduced? It rather is the lead isn't it?
Reworded
  • After the race: Post-race is the more conventional way to name this section, I believe.
 Done
  • Optionally, you might think about bolding the names of teams and drivers still able to take the title in the standings after the race section.
 Done

So much from me. Cheers, Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed you have! Congrats, it a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]