Jump to content

Talk:24 (Kanye West song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article24 (Kanye West song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 29, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 18, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Kanye West's "24" was recorded in tribute to Kobe Bryant a few days after his death?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:24 (Kanye West song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FormalDude (talk · contribs) 03:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will be posting updates here as I complete this review. Please allow up to seven days for the review to be completed. ––FormalDude talk 03:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

[edit]
  • Use of this image doesn't make much sense to me. It's from a presidential rally but the caption is about his vocal performance.
  • I changed the alt text to Kanye West in 2020, but the normal text can stay as it is because having a picture of him here without any text explaining the significance would be pointless. --K. Peake 17:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Kyle Peake: Sorry, but I'm finding that to not be in line with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions at all. Not every image needs a caption. And the caption is supposed to clearly identify the subject of the photo. West is not singing in the photo, so the caption is misleading. I know this is nit picky but I'm gonna need some better justification if you're not going to change the caption. ––FormalDude talk 06:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The song was met with generally positive reviews from music critics, who mostly praised the vocals. this is pretty clearly WP:SYNTH. I don't think any sources have evaluated the reviews of this song yet. If I'm wrong please provide a verifying source.

Review

[edit]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. No problems at all.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. This article is a great example of good article layout.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. Referencing is verifiable and attributed as necessary.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). Sourcing is reliable. Article follows NPOV.
2c. it contains no original research. One issue with WP:SYNTH, has been resolved.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. No indication of any copyright violations.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. Good job covering a well known artist's relatively new song.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Good summary style.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Article incorporates multiple viewpoints where necessary, and is

otherwise written from a NPOV.

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Unfortunately not many recent images are available for Kanye West.

You did a good job making use of photos where available.

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. See note above.
7. Overall assessment. Listed as a Good Article.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk21:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Kyle Peake (talk). Self-nominated at 09:27, 29 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • . New enough (promoted to GA status on 12/28) and long enough (> 10,000 characters of narrative text). Article is neutrally written and well cited. Earwig detected no issues. Hooks are short enough, sourced and interesting. DYK complete. Cbl62 (talk) 05:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]