Talk:49th meridian east

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geographical coordinates

49th meridian east is of interest to WikiProject Geographical coordinates, which encourages the use of geographical coordinates in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Geographical coordinatesWikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinatesTemplate:WikiProject Geographical coordinatesGeographical coordinates

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed deletion

User:Stifle added a Proposed Deletion template to this article (citing "Bad precedent/original research magnet"). I have removed this template as I can see no justification for it. My reasoning is as follows:

A precedent to retain latitude and longitude articles has already been set. Similar articles have previously been taken to AfD and their notability discussed. Whilst these have attracted some negative comments, they have all led to a Keep decision - it would seem that plenty of people feel that this sort of information is sufficiently notable and worthwhile. (See 104°E, 19°S, 19°N, 18°S, 18°N, 17°S, 15°S, 14°S, 14°N, 12°S, 12°N, 11°S and 11°N.)
As a geographic/cartographic subject, the source for these articles are maps. Whilst it may appear that no source is cited here, in fact the Geohack co-ordinates at the top of the page are a link to that source. Previously, in similar articles, I have used a direct link to the MSN Maps website (e.g. [1]). However it was pointed out to me that this did not meet WP:EL criteria and qualified as spam (though I disagree somewhat with that latter point); I was recommeded to use Geohack as an alternative. I feel as though I am between a rock and a hard place with this - I can either use an inappropriately formatted source, or a source that doesn't look like a source. I would welcome suggestions as to how this can be improved, but I must stress that this is not a sourceless article.
This is not Original Research. All of the information is verifiable from commonly available reference material, i.e. atlases or on-line mapping sites. I have simply been tranferring the information from one format (cartographic) to another (textual). This is certainly not original thought, analysis or synthesis.

Bazonka (talk) 00:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stifle is a super-experienced guy, and his observation makes sense. Btw, he isn't suggesting you're the one doing the OR; he merely notes that these pages could attract OR (his word is "magnet").

With respect to formatting sources... I had had suggested that you use a template. That way you can have your cake and eat it too, and it would also allow you to maintain these links from a central location. If you like, I can cobble together such a thing for you. -- Fullstop (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fullstop. I have already created a template (Latlongmap) which incorporates the Geohack coords with an overview map. I've started to put this into a number of articles (such as this one). I'd be happy if you could suggest any ways of improving it though. Bazonka (talk) 00:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll yield to previous consensus on this one. Indeed, I'm not accusing anyone of original research, but there's a lot of stuff that could get dumped in here without citation. Stifle (talk) 13:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]