This is the most common name used for the star. Similar to why most people say "55 Cancri" over Rho-1 Cancri, etc. — NuclearVacuum 20:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Agree with move - a literature search on SIMBAD confirms that the Flamsteed designation is used more often in paper titles, plus the current article title "Pi2 Ursae Majoris" is an incorrect rendering: the 2 should be superscript. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 11:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Omega² Aquarii which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:52, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Pi2 Ursae Majoris → 4 Ursae Majoris – The page was moved to 4 Ursae Majoris as the most common name after a move discussion (see above). It was then moved back to the Bayer designation by User:Chermundy without discussion. As evidence of the use of 4 Ursae Majoris over Pi2 Ursae Majoris, see the discovery paper for the planet. --RelistedCúchullaint/c 15:23, 23 October 2012 (UTC)22.214.171.124 (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Bayer designation takes priority over Flamsteed designations. This has more to do with consistancy among the pages than the usage. Benkenobi18 (talk) 03:57, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Looking at WP:STARNAMES I see no mention of that rather subtle distinction (which would be a sensible way of avoiding superscripts in the titles). I suggest: first determine whether or not STARNAMES is complete and correct, update it if necessary, then decide whether to rename this and any other articles in accordance with it. --Mirokado (talk) 15:20, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I have just modified one external link on 4 Ursae Majoris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.