Talk:ARA Almirante Brown (1880)

ARA Almirante Brown (1880) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 11, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve ARA Almirante Brown (1880), or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / South America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	South American military history task force

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:ARA Almirante Brown (1880)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 22:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No disambiguation links (no action required)
No duplicate links (no action required)
Checklinks appears to be fine (no action required)
Image licensing and captions appear in order (no action required)
Sourcing checks out (no action required)

MOS/prose:

nine-inch steel-faced armor in the lead should have {{convert/spell }} template with adj=on parameter.
- Did you mean to use the convert template in the lead? If so, that's been fixed.
In 650 t, tonnes should be spelled out. If there were a couple extra measurements in t nearby, abbreviated version would be fine.
- Done.
Per MOS:CURRENCY full name of the currency should be used instead of ₤ symbol.
- Where? As far as I can tell, it says that the pound symbol is what should be used to represent pound sterling.
  - Oops, I read the double vs single barred symbol (£ vs ₤). I still can't believe there are two symbols. Never mind that one.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. No problems with the prose IMO, just a few MOS-related-nitpicking issues.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article, Tomobe. Let me know if there's anything else that needs doing. Parsecboy (talk) 15:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Higher res version of the one in the article here. Parsecboy (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed in intro section

Hi wikipedians, I've just tagged a sentence in the intro section asking for source citation; as in the article's body there is no information supporting that summary sentence. Regardless, I think is still a "good article" so no need to change this rating. Thank and regards, DPdH (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the service history section, though "nearly two decades" is a bit of an overstatement. Parsecboy (talk) 12:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing to the supporting info about largest ship. Can't find the one related to use of steel though. Regards, DPdH (talk) 12:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]