Talk:ATN

Australia: Sydney / Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal ATN is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of ATN was copied or moved into 2023 in Australian television with this edit on 04:10, 10 July 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Nine News#Sydney (New South Wales)|Nine News Sydney]] The anchor (Sydney (New South Wales)) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Edit 167391748 by IP 58.168.65.159

Three edits were made by IP 58.168.65.159 over 25 October to 27 October 2007. The last (167392099) and first edit (166949473) appear to be legitimate but the middle edit has, IMHO, questionable material.

For the edit 167391748, the user claims on line 42 that Home and Away is produced at Pyrmont yet the Home and Away page states that the series is currently produced at the Epping studios, Palm Beach and Collaroy.

The other bits of this edit also appear questionable. "Rival" [National Nine news] has been changed to "ex-big winner" and "Sydney" to "Melbourne" even though this page only talks about Channel Seven in Sydney.

Three times on the programming list, the user has added "Classic old". What would this mean?

It is my belief that this edit is vandalism, with the exception of "A year before the news and current affairs moved to Martin Place", which needs to be backed up with a reference.

Cula 14:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fast forward and Full Frontal were Melbourne productions filmed in South Melbourne. Kath and Kim is a Melbourne production also. Are people stupid? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesbehave (talk • contribs) 17:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Quaidy 04:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WTF? Someone says that ACA was on Seven? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.193.120 (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ATN7 12m Sattelites.jpg

Image:ATN7 12m Sattelites.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ATN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]