Talk:A Place with No Name

A Place with No Name was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 31, 2009	Articles for deletion	Kept
August 20, 2009	Articles for deletion	Merged
August 27, 2009	Articles for deletion	Kept
September 8, 2009	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
December 16, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
April 23, 2014	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Michael Jackson Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michael Jackson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Michael Jackson on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Michael JacksonWikipedia:WikiProject Michael JacksonTemplate:WikiProject Michael JacksonMichael Jackson articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Artwork

since the song was being previewed prior to the release of Xscape, an artwork for each song has also been released. here's for APWNN: http://vallieegirl67.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/fullscreen-capture-572014-81547-am.jpg?w=665

Nirolife (talk) 14:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Single

Can we confirm that this is supposed to be a single? MaJic (talk) 05:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, we can not, it will most likely be a single from a posthumous album, we can not confirm anything yet. --JDelo93 (talk) 00:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Most likely"? What makes you say that? Nobody knows if it will ever be released at all. Come to think of it, is this even notable enough for an article?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.191.161.141 (talk) 17:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Sampled

This song does not sample A Horse With No Name it resembles it. That is an easy misconception, a word needs to be used to describe that it sounds similar not that it is sampled. --JDelo93 (talk) 03:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

85.145.146.57 (talk) 14:15, 18 October 2009 (UTC)'resembles' ?[reply]

Yeah exactly, "Resembles?"

I think we need to revisit the whole "resembles" concept. The song doesn't sample and doesn't resemble. This is an actual adaptation or cover of the original by America. As a matter of fact Dewey Bunnell who wrote the original is included in the credits. This wouldn't be the case it the song just "resembled" the original. Damien shields puts it in words very accurately, "a lyrically re-written cover of the 1972 hit “A Horse With No Name” by the band America" http://www.damienshields.com/michael-jacksons-a-place-with-no-name-the-story-behind-the-song/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2klodu67 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on A Place with No Name. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090629064129/http://www.calgaryherald.com:80/Health/Michael+Jackson+King+dead/1733159/story.html to http://www.calgaryherald.com/health/Michael+Jackson+King+dead/1733159/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on A Place with No Name. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090705104310/http://www.straitstimes.com:80/Breaking+News/Lifestyle/Story/STIStory_398061.html to http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Lifestyle/Story/STIStory_398061.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Americaog.ogg

File:Americaog.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Place with No Name. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Charts are totally wrong, eg the song was only #93 in France (1 week) and not #1, please remove false info

Charts are totally wrong, eg the song was only #93 in France (1 week) and not #1, please remove false info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.90.3.64 (talk) 15:59, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]