Talk:A Princess for Christmas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Plot[edit]

This is supposed to be a plot summary, not a detailled re-telling, especially considering how little actual plot this movie has. It should be cut by about 80 percent. -- Imladros (talk) 11:42, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More about the Plot[edit]

From the last line, it sounds like Castlebury is a fictional sovereign duchy and Edward is a sovereign duke, which explains why Ashton is a prince and "will rule someday". However, if that were the case, shouldn't Jules be aware of the fact that Castlebury is a sovereign country ? Furthermore, the guests at Edward's party don't seem to address him as someone would normally address a sovereign. An alternative, albeit unlikely, would be that both Edward and Ashton are actually princes of a royal family of some country in the line of succession to its respective throne, and Edward, in addition, also holds a peerage at the rank of duke. In that case, however, at least in the UK, Edward would be titled just "HRH The Duke of Castlebury" and his son, "HRH Prince Ashton of Castlebury". The plot simply doesn't make sense ! 161.24.19.112 (talk) 13:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Princess for Christmas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]