Talk:Active packaging

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Active packaging article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Packaging

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Packaging, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of containers, packaging, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PackagingWikipedia:WikiProject PackagingTemplate:WikiProject PackagingContainers articles

active vs intelligent

We need to improve this page. First of all, active packaging is not the same as intelligent or smart packaging. Or is this the USA approach? If not then I propose to remove the reference; there are better references. Agree that I do some editing? E.J.Hoekstra (talk) 18:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes,this page needs help. The topics are related but eventually there should probably be a split. I hope other editors can also make contributions. Pkgx (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Active packaging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070623222916/http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/researchinfo/contaminantsresearch/contactmaterials/a03prog/a03projlist/a03039proj/ to http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/researchinfo/contaminantsresearch/contactmaterials/a03prog/a03projlist/a03039proj/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Active packaging. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Direct-to-Consumer Engagement

A section on Direct-to-Consumer Engagement has been added and re-added. This seems to be a marketing and merchandising program which, may have some merit, but not in this article. This article is on package forms and components which physically interact with the product or with the environment to extend shelf life, signal defectiveness, or other technical functions. Direct-to-Consumer Engagement does not belong in this article. Pkgx (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had tagged this section as being "dubious" for this article. The subject of consumer engagement might be a good fit for Merchandising or Advertising. It does not fit in this technical article about active packages. The unregistered contributor decided not to discuss the issue but just to remove the tag. The Wikipedia rules on Wikipedia:Edit warring and Wikipedia:Dispute resolution should be reviewed. I have replaced the tag. I welcome a discussion this Talk page. Pkgx (talk) 19:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As this combines active packaging and connected/smart packaging as one article, I believe Direct to Consumer engagement and marketing within connected packaging belongs in this article.

Alternatively, as mentioned above under "active vs intelligent', these should strip out elements into two articles. One on active packaging, the second on smart/connected packaging.

As a professional who delivers marketing solutions in this field, I welcome the discussion and how we can improve this content. 2001:44B8:25C:7B00:E0EA:A384:6BB4:87C1 (talk) 07:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the point. You can improve content but your subject does NOT belong in this article. It belongs in Advertising, Marketing, or Merchandising. You seem new to Wikipedia. Please join, create a name, and read the rules for making contributions. Pkgx (talk) 13:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There ha been no justification given for having this section so I will delete it again. Pkgx (talk) 23:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Q R Code

The section on QR Codes is nice but it does not relate to this article about technically active packages. The input on QR codes would be better in the Bar Code article, QR Code article, or perhaps Advertising. It is not an active nor intelligent package component. Pkgx (talk) 19:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the section and provided a better section namePkgx (talk) 23:46, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]