Talk:Advance Australia Party (2010)

	Australia portal Advance Australia Party (2010) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Possible rename[edit]

On the NSW 2019 ballot paper, Raymond Brown is listed under group F, "Advance". Has the party changed its name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.47.246.111 (talk) 04:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Directing Preferences[edit]

Where does this party generally direct preferences to? Tabletop (talk) 01:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Building Australia Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110911032915/http://www.bpn.com.au/article/Building-Australia-Party-sets-hopes-high-for-NSW-election/528577.aspx to http://www.bpn.com.au/article/Building-Australia-Party-sets-hopes-high-for-NSW-election/528577.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 March 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: move based on the suggestion by The Drover's Wife. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist ^{Wear a mask to protect everyone} 13:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Building Australia Party → Advance Australia Party
Advance Australia Party → ?

Building Australia Party → Advance Australia Party – Party was renamed during the 2019 nsw election, current Advance Australia page is a redirect to an old party Catiline52 (talk) 04:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from WP:RM/TR for discussion. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The target is an article Advance Australia Party, that has to be sorted out. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support some sort of move, but I'm not sure the current party has WP:PRIMARYTOPIC primacy over the old one; they're both extremely minor. Perhaps Advance Australia Party (current) for this one? If these guys ever win a seat, we can revisit. Frickeg (talk) 06:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this move. They're both effectively former minor parties who are still lingering around in some context, with the original one arguably being slightly more notable. If it wasn't for the NSW state registration, I'd oppose a move entirely given that they're much better known as the Building Australia Party and, well, our article claims they're basically dead, which would make the rename a bit questionable. Given the NSW registration, I'd support moves to Advance Australia Party (1988) and Advance Australia Party (2010), akin to the solution we used with the many and varied Country Parties, at least some of which also had a penchant for last-gasp renames. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose but, and, and as per The Drover's Wife. Aoziwe (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support alternative of Advance Australia Party → Advance Australia Party (1988) and Building Australia Party → Advance Australia Party (2010) with Advance Australia Party redirecting to Advance Australia Party (1988) with a hatnote regarding the 2010 party at the target. Basically, what The Drover's Wife said except accounting for WP:TWODABS based on the slight advantage in notability the earlier party has over the later party. SITH (talk) 11:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is not consistent with WP:TWODABS. If there is no primary topic, there needs to be a disambiguation page per WP:NOPRIMARY. Frickeg (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.