Talk:African American biblical hermeneutics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 15 June 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Result:
Moved per consensus garnered below. Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; good health to all! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 10:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

African-American biblical hermeneuticsAfrican American biblical hermeneuticsWP:COMMONNAME is without hyphen, as can be attested through the references cited in article and other scholarly literature on the subject. A similar discussion was had in the Talk:Asian American studies#Requested move 18 June 2021.—Caorongjin 💬 16:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. Spekkios (talk) 01:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC). Per lack of consensus: — Relisting. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Please see MOS:DUALNATIONALITIES: "An en dash between separate nations; for people and things identifying with multiple nationalities, use a hyphen when applied as an adjective or a space as a noun." Without the hyphen, it is simply not correct punctuation. Google often bases its results off Wikipedia, so you have to be very cautious when using it to determine WP:COMMONNAME. The main papers about ethnic American biblical hermeneutics also do not use correct punctuation. Therefore I strongly recommend keeping the hyphen. Florificapis (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would clarify that "Africa" and "African" is by no means a nation/nationality. So I don't see how MOS:DUALNATIONALITIES applies here. —Caorongjin 💬 16:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom; ngrams shows no use of current name, but some use of the proposed name. BilledMammal (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.