Talk:Ai-Da
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ai-Da article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 14 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shmalice lastname.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Spoof / con trick srticle
[edit]It's doesn't take much research into this article to conclude that is is part of a web of thinly veiled con-tricks. 81.154.4.27 (talk) 02:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- So let's see the wp:reliable sources that say so since your personal opinion is not enough. (Your comment was potentially libellous so I have edited it.) --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 10:00, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
"The world’s first ultra-realistic humanoid robot artist"
[edit]There have been multiple edits made over the lifetime of this page to put this catchphrase at the very beginning of the first sentence of the page, removing "(...) is described by its creator as" or any other introduction. The phrase is used heavily in Ai-Da promotional material, including their official website. While this does describe what Ai-Da is, I think a more generic lead-in sentence like in this older version of the article better introduces the topic (and also isn't copied straight from Ai-Da ad copy). Does anyone else agree or disagree? Android field (talk) 16:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I agree. Especially as I wrote that preamble first time round. So I will now put it back: if anyone has an independent RS that supports the claim with evidence, it can come out again. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)