|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
I removed the word "alleged" from the see also section regarding Quranic proof because it is established and clear. All traditional schools of thought, along with Sunni and Shia jurists agree on the matter.
insearch 01:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC);
- Take your regards and shove them where the sun don't shine. Fuck what those Neanderthal schools of thought say. Homosexuality is a natural phenomenon in the animal kingdom and it is in the human kingdom, so fucking get over it.DemocracyOverTheocracy (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
well... It can not be considered as an Islamic organisation since it is against Islamic principles and practices —Preceding unsigned comment added by insearch (talk • contribs) 00:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well...Islam, as well as every other organized religion, cannot be considered pro-human because its goal is to instill within humans a vociferous hatred, greed, fear, paranoia and shame. If Islam is to be taken seriously in this century and the centuries to come, it had better modernize or no one of spiritual morality will ever take it seriously.DemocracyOverTheocracy (talk) 16:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)