Talk:Alcide Nunez

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alcide Nunez article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alcide Nunez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415065234/http://www.hurricanebrassband.nl/Musician%20alcide%20nunez.htm to http://www.hurricanebrassband.nl/Musician%20alcide%20nunez.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weary Blues Merge proposal by User:Vmavanti

User:Vmavanti has posted a proposal for Weary Blues to be merged into the Alcide Nunez article (but has thus far offered no explanation as to why). No. I object to this proposal, and suggest it be closed promptly. Nunez did not compose the tune. He was in the band that made the first jazz recording of the number, but that is not the most famous recording of the number. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where would you like to see it merged?
Vmavanti (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason why it needs to be merged at all. The article on the composer, Artie Matthews, seems to me a much better place if there was a need to merge. Why not leave it as a separate article? -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you believe that the article Weary Blues as it stands now is a good article?
Vmavanti (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a "Good article", just a useful article to have on Wikipedia. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:52, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was not my question. Nor are you supposed to use "a useful article to have on Wikipedia" as the basis for your judgment. We judge by notability here. You have not mentioned the most obvious point of all. This article has had NO SOURCES since it was created ELEVEN YEARS AGO. I see no reason to wait another eleven years for someone to get off their keester and actually do something about it. We delete this article or we merge it. Take your pick.
Vmavanti (talk) 04:31, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I specifically had answered your question; sorry if my attempt at replying was not what you were looking for. Thank you for finally explaining why you think the article ought to be merged. I already expressed my opinion of what I consider a much more reasonable existing article for it to be merged into should "merge" be the decision. Cheers. -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]