Talk:Algea (mythology)

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 8 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Algos to Algea (mythology). The result of the discussion was moved.

Names in Seneca quotes

"Letum/ Ker (Ruin) and Lues/ Nosos (Pestilence), Mors/ Thanatos (Death), Labor/ Ponos (Hardship), Tabes/ Phthisis (Corruption) and Dolor/ Algos (Distress), fit company for him, shall all depart together". This is a bit of a mess. Obviously Seneca actually just uses the Latin names, and the quote doesn't follow that, but is smooshing together the Roman, Greek, and translated English names in a very awkward way. Be clearer and better-looking to have "Dolor [Algos; Distress]" and so forth, unless anyone has a better idea. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Greek equivalents should be removed altogether unless they can be sourced. – Michael Aurel (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That'd be awkward given that the article's at the Greek name, but {{cn}}s indeed. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 09:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Checking a few reference works, it seems pretty clear that the only actual mention of the Algea is in Hesiod's Theogony. As I can't find a source to suggest that the Algea mentioned there are the same as any figures referred to under a Latin name, the parts sourced to Hyginus, Statius, and Seneca should be removed. Unfortunately a lot of pages for these minor personifications (especially the Hesiodic children of Nyx and Eris) tend to contain a fair bit of OR (probably added by people with good intentions, but who looked at only primary sources when writing). – Michael Aurel (talk) 10:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. dab page setup will be handled via WP:BOLD. – robertsky (talk) 05:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Algos → Algea (mythology) – Hesiod does not refer to "Algos", but rather to the plural Ἄλγεα. See Most's Greek and translation, as well as Caldwell's translation and note. I have no opinion as to whether the mythological Algea or the company (currently at Algea) is the primary topic; if people feel that this page is the primary topic, then we could instead move the company to Algea (company), and this page to Algea. – Michael Aurel (talk) 23:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither seems like it's likely to be overwhelmingly predominant, so I'd suggest a disambig at that title, and moving both pages to qualified names. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 00:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'm fine with that solution. – Michael Aurel (talk) 09:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support either suggestion. Paul August ☎ 18:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.