Jump to content

Talk:Amy Holmes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fox News

[edit]

Amy Holmes has never worked for FOX News. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.188.136 (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Holmes began her career on television as a Fox News Channel contributor..."CNN TV - Anchors/Reporters:Amy Holmes
--AndersW (talk) 01:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

conservative

[edit]

she is a republican, but i don't know about being conservative. Mpondopondo (talk) 07:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took out the identification as Republican because she's a registered Independent. 98.200.114.221 (talk) 01:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance

[edit]

Why does this person warrant a profile on Wiki? I suggest this profile be deleted. It is self-promotion and Wiki is being used as an advertising forum for personal gain. I thought this was against Wiki policy?124.186.70.61 (talk) 00:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

She's certainly noteworthy enough for a Wiki entry. This sounds to me like someone just doesn't like Holmes, and so is trying to get her deleted for personal rather than objective reasons. --TallulahBelle (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure the person that doesn't think she is noteworthy is a liberal that believes all intelligent conservative blacks are not noteworthy. It must also make that person even more frustrated that she is a beautiful young lady. What does beauty have to do with this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.115.12.254 (talk) 13:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The CNN Anchor link is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.119.145.131 (talk) 10:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

she's been on the news as a commentator for years. there is no reason to exclude her from wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.49.6.225 (talk) 06:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amy Holmes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amy Holmes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]