Jump to content

Talk:Anand (2004 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleAnand (2004 film) was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 13, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
December 4, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 25, 2011Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Fair use rationale for Image:Anand2004film.jpg

[edit]

Image:Anand2004film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

[edit]

Will develop the plot in the next few days. Mspraveen 16:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More talk on the article

[edit]

Please find more talk on the article in my talk page -- Mspraveen 06:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sekhar kammula.jpg

[edit]

Image:Sekhar kammula.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AnandDVD.JPG

[edit]

Image:AnandDVD.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold notes

[edit]
  • [1][2][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Anand1.jpg need better fair use rationales.
  • There are too many images being used - might wanna remove one or two.
  • Footnotes need to be placed AFTER a punctuation mark - at the moment most of them are before, this needs to be fixed.
  • References need accessdates

Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 02:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
  • Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.[?]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • “In the year [of] 2004”
  • The script has spotted the following contractions: doesn't, doesn't, couldn't, wasn't, Don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 02:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, even though I didn't nominate this article because I knew it had few issues that you pointed out. Now that it is a GA nominee, I did not want my efforts to go wasted. I have made the following changes as against to your comments.
  1. [3][4][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Anand1.jpg need better fair use rationales. - Corrected and checked for all the other images used in the article.
  2. There are too many images being used - might wanna remove one or two. - I feel the images used are actually very important to convey the content written in the article, be it the plot or while depicting the director in question. For several other articles that I've seen, this was very much considered. Maybe, you can reconsider this point.
  3. Footnotes need to be placed AFTER a punctuation mark - at the moment most of them are before, this needs to be fixed. - Fixed!
  4. References need accessdates - Fixed along with added first, last names of the authors wherever present.
  5. As such, there weren't any major changes needed as per the suggestions of the javascript program...the ones which I could spot were altered accordingly.
If anything else deserves any further editing, please notify me. Best regards, Mspraveen 15:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passed :) Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 01:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A few issues re. this article's GA status - so I'll list there here rather than going to GAR.
  • The plot section could do with some references, separate from just citing the film.
  • The cast section shouldn't be in a list form, or else should have more prose. And it should be more formal.

That's the main stuff - hopefully we can improve this article further. Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 07:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion pertaining to non-free image(s) used in article

[edit]

A cleanup page has been created for WP:FILMS' spotlight articles. One element that is being checked in ensuring the quality of the articles is the non-free images. Currently, one or more non-free images being used in this article are under discussion to determine if they should be removed from the article for not complying with non-free and fair use requirements. Please comment at the corresponding section within the image cleanup listing. Before contributing the discussion, please first read WP:FILMNFI concerning non-free images. Ideally the discussions pertaining to the spotlight articles will be concluded by the end of June, so please comment soon to ensure there is clear consensus. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:22, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Anand (2004 film)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Encouraging work here. Lage_Raho_Munna_Bhai will give you some ideas of what you are ultimately aiming for and what the article lacks, including more in-text references, and several other sections. Good luck. Ncmvocalist 15:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Anand (2004 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anand_(2004_film)&oldid=1198662467"