Talk:Ancient Egyptian medicine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Ancient Egypt (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Alternative medicine (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
 
WikiProject History of Science (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Medicine (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Untitled[edit]

I like this topic, and I plan to clean up the article. I've pushed down the old version under General Overview and I plan to write better versions on the various topics in their own sections, and then delete them from the general section. Eventually I'll cover everything in the general section and delete it. I'd be happy for any help. MickWest 23:55, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.251.60.210 (talk) 15:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

"History of swnw"[edit]

"The ancient Egyptian word for doctor is swnw. There is a long history of swnw in ancient Egypt."

Is that a history of the profession or history of the word? -Pgan002 05:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Pronunciation of "swnw"[edit]

How is the word pronounced? -Pgan002 05:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

All Egyptian pronunciation is assumed, there were no native speakers of Ancient Egyptian since the Rosetta Stone was discovered. But sunu (soo-noo) is what would be assumed. KV(Talk) 17:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

SWNW Link[edit]

It seems a bit meta to me that you would link a page to itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.254.91 (talk) 22:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


News[edit]

Someone may like to read this... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1320507/Cancer-purely-man-say-scientists-finding-trace-disease-Egyptian-mummies.html Merlin-UK (talk) 04:54, 15 October 2010 (UTC) and another source http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8064554/Cancer-caused-by-modern-man-as-it-was-virtually-non-existent-in-ancient-world.html Merlin-UK (talk) 05:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

dead footnote links,...[edit]

just to inform to all, that footnote links number 1, and 7,... both of them, appears as error 404,...
with my regards,... --Cpant23 (talk) 05:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


Earliest known physician[edit]

Merit-Ptah c. 2700 BC predates the earliest physicians mentioned in this article and also in History of medicine. USchick (talk) 20:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Anon IP request[edit]

Hello everyone, I just share here the remark which an anon IP wrote at the bottom of the page: Iry-Hor (talk) 13:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Add some examples of the medicines used in the ancient egypt.

Review/update of References completed.[edit]

Hey folks! Just finished a complete review of all 32 references on this article. Dead links have been investigated and all of them have been restored. Cryptic references to books were tracked down. ISBN's added. Publishers of websites identified. Duplicate sources have been consolidated, as far as possible. Everything has been converted into Help:Citation Style 1.

The results are as follows: 13 books (2 are self-published, 4 are over 80 years old), 1 peer-reviewed journal, 1 foreign language journal, 1 conference proceedings, 2 news websites, 1 magazine, 1 encyclopedia, and 9 websites, for a total of 29 unique sources. There are 3 additional references to websites that have been previously cited on the page, making for the total of 32. I understand there's no simple way to combine these near duplicates.

Overall, the refs seem to be pretty good, though there are some that can be improved. Given how cryptic some of them were, and a few naked URL dead links, it had been rather difficult to really go over the refs and try to improve them. Now that all of them have been fully researched and have live links, this would be a good time to do just that.

The four non-current books are all translations of ancient manuscripts. While you may not think this may matter ... certainly the manuscripts haven't changed ... but what has changed in the last century is our understanding of ancient Egyptian, and Egyptology in general. Some of the first Egyptologists were known to have made some bad assumptions and told some rather fantastic stories, not supported by the evidence. Also, archaeological discoveries are being made all the time, and sometimes, the find of a papyrus fragment can make a major change in our understanding of a text. So it is good to rely only on the latest translations available. Other than that, things look pretty good. Face-smile.svg

Hi-storian (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)