Talk:Andrei Amalrik

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Andrei Amalrik article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism C‑class Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Language & literature / History / Mass media Start‑class Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the language and literature of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the mass media in Russia task force.

Further information: Will the Soviet Union Survive Until 1984?

The sentence "He also failed to predict that he himself would not survive 1980" is fairly ridiculous. It seems unfair to call the inability to predict one's own death a "failure" and isn't really relevant to the text, is it?Kilkeel (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Kilkeel[reply]

Problem

That is so weird, I don't know if this is a bug or intentional, here is what happened:

I typed in [[Further information: Will the Soviet Union Survive Until 1984?]] using the {{Further| }} tag, on the Predictions of Soviet collapse page,
When I pressed "save", I was redirected to Andrei Amalrik (this page).

Question

Is wikipedia that intutive? Is this an unintentional bug (a very useful bug, I might add) or was this intended?

Theory

Computer programs (particuarly wikipedia and open source in general) are similar to evolution: Like evoution, in computer programming, some bugs (traits/mutations) are found to be useful, but most traits are discarded, and only the strongest survive.

Occasionally there is a genetic defect which is accidental, but it is so useful, that despite the "defect" being cast away, it survives and florishes.

I am sure there is an acedemic article about this.

Answer? (later)

Is there somekind of template embedded in either the Andrei Amalrik and/or Predictions of Soviet collapse pages? I think there maybe a template in either the Andrei Amalrik and/or Predictions of Soviet collapse pages.

I think I may have actually created this redirect, :) without really knowing the usefulness of this function/power.Odessaukrain 15:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Andrei Amalrik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This article is impressively biased against the author. Between citing the guy that called his predictions "accidents" while not including anything other writers have said of his achievements, mentioning a 7-year gap between his predictions and the real thing like that's a failure and not an award-deserving prediction, and the hilarious "failed to predict his own death" part that luckily was spotted and removed by some editors in the first topic above, this article at times feels almost hostile against Amalrik. I have begun adding notes to other sources about him that show different points of view, and i invite more editors to do the same. YuriNikolai (talk) 21:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]