Talk:Angelino Heights, Los Angeles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject California / Los Angeles / Southern California (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Los Angeles task force (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Southern California task force (marked as Low-importance).
 

Page move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved, per discussion GTBacchus(talk) 02:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


Angelino Heights, Los Angeles, CaliforniaAngelino Heights, Los Angeles — Per naming conventions of Chicago and Brooklyn, and to make names shorter and more navigable. Was suggested by another user at Talk:Spaulding Square. Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 05:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

By the way, I missed a lot of neighborhoods. Somebody add them, please. Thank you! Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 05:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Support as the person who suggested it at Talk:Spaulding Square. It seems silly to have California in the title, when Los Angeles is one of the few cities in the United States where, per our naming conventions, we exclude the state. Skinsmoke (talk) 16:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Aye The gentleman's proposal is supported by precedent and common sense. Butros (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Support Precedent of other cities should be considered.--Jkfp2004 (talk) 22:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.