Talk:Anna Pavignano

Anna Pavignano received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Italy

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LANA.Film. Peer reviewers: Carrot47, ThatOneGal, Mturta, AuBeYeux, NourHalouani.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

This article is solid with a lot of information and a clear structure. The content is neutral and there are good sources as "Women Screenwriter An International Guide" that I use myself for my own article.

Something I'm concern about is her filmography list. As you said, she worked with other writer in her life. That is why I'd do a list for her work as a writer and another for her work with other people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AuBeYeux (talk • contribs) 23:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Modifications & Suggestions

This is a great article! You have done a remarkable amount of research into Anna Pavignano s’ career life. The paragraph is described in a well-organized manner; it also included important details pertinent to her career life.

I have a few recommendations that might help in ameliorating your article. I believe that it would bring more depth to this article if you elaborate more on the personal life of Pavignano, because it will create a better picture of this person’s past and who she was before she becomes a screenwriter. Also, I would like to point out that the sources you have cited are broad, and this will help you gain a better objective perspective into Anna Pavignanos’ life. I would like to also suggest you write a brief summary introducing your screenwriter, this will give your article a lead (a starting point). Overall, this is a good article, and I think that those suggestions might help you improve your article to some extent.

I wish you the best and I hope my recommendations will help

NourHalouani (talk) 03:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

→ The article is good, but I feel that some formulation could be reworked. The flow is a little weird to me. There is also some spelling/grammar mistake (eg . "worked on television shows to pay for her study", unless she really worked on one television show). As for the references, two of them bring us on the main page of the website instead of where you found the information, it would be a good idea to fix that. Otherwise, good work! Mturta (talk) 20:56, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hi! I just finished reviewing your article and I think it's really solid and you did some great work! Here are some of my recommendations and comments:

I would suggest using more "objective" (sorry I can't think of a better word) like wikipedia language, what I mean is to write more as if you are presenting information about like a history or something as in "she met the actor, director and screenwriter..." rather than "meets"
you can also say they began their relationship rather than "she found love", just little things
you can actually take out where you say how Trosi died because it seems subjective and doesn't really relate to her career
when you talk about her book you can say it is a semi-autobigraphy since it's based on her own life
great job with adding her filmography divided into what is collaborative and what is not, also in adding the table with the awards she received
the awards section can be a section of its own
great sources and lots of information! your article is very detailed and is very well laid out

Carrot47 (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]