Talk:Anne Bogart

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

BRD

There is a cleanup tag "dates in reverse chronological order, contrary to WP:DATELIST". So I reversed the order and removed the tag. This edit was undone with the edit comment "Bogart prefers the previous order of publications". Bogart doesn't get a vote. The question is whether there is an exception in the MOS allowing this to remain in reverse chronological order or if it should be changed to chronological order. RJFJR (talk) 13:53, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Without a good reason to depart from the norm, the list should be kept in the usual chronological order. I'm more concerned about the large chunk of promotional and unsourced material in the article, and the fact that Ben 1979 is directly editing the article despite an obvious (yet undeclared) conflict of interest. I'll try to take a closer look when I'm back on a laptop. – Teratix ₵ 23:48, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Teratix: Bogart doesn't get to decide whether or not this Wikipedia article is granted a specific exception to the standard house style, neither should Bogart or a person who is operating under the guidance of Bogart be editing this article directly per WP:COI. I'm agnostic on the WP:NPOV issues, but on the narrow matter of following Wikipedia's standard article format and style, we should not be taking the advice of the article subject on such matters. --Jayron 32 16:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree, and reverted the order of the publications. – Fayenatic London 08:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of productions

The list of productions is far too long for an encyclopedia article. It should be trimmed down to career highlights as evidenced by independent citations, and headed "Selected productions". – Fayenatic London 08:12, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]