Jump to content

Talk:Anti-fouling paint

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HISTORY section

[edit]

Corrections were made in the penultimate paragraph, based on a closer reading of the citation[1] (currently cite #5 in the main article) of a Feb. 10, 1900 letter sent from the U.S. Navy to the U.S. Senate's Committee on Naval Affairs (eventually absorbed into the newly formed Senate Armed Services Committee in 1946). In the following two paragraphs copied from page 17 of cite #5 and pasted here, the directly relevant text is in the second paragraph (which I bolded). The first paragraph is provided for context.

The first country to take the initiative step in building iron vessels for the navy was Great Britain. The Dover, a small paddle steamer, was built in 1839, and was followed by the Alert, Soudan, and Wilberforce, all of small size. It was not until the year 1843, however, that the building of war steamers of iron began; the first, the Trident, of 850 tons, was built by Ditchburn & Moore. During the next three years 34 iron steamers were built or purchased for the Government, among which were the Birkenhead and Megæra. The latter was lost in 1871 through circumstances that are likely to occur again to any iron steamer, namely, corrosion of skin plates to such an extent that they almost dropped from the frames. France followed England closely in the new departure in shipbuilding, and both countries soon possessed a large number of iron steamers.
But soon a temporary reaction took place, caused by the discovery of the tendency of iron ships to foul. In fact, such was the alarm felt by the Admiralty in 1847 at the formidable character of this kind of mischief, that it threatened to fix a limit to the employment of iron ships for naval purposes. The board had commenced selling, and were debating about the sale of all seagoing iron ships. The discovery of an antifouling paint that gave very fair results caused the Admiralty to reconsider its contemplated action; the iron vessels were retained and the building of that class continued.Sharl928 (talk) 23:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Letter from the Secretary of the Navy, Transmitting the Views of the Members of the Board on Construction Relative to the Question of Sheathing and Coppering the Three Battle Ships and the Three Armored Cruisers Authorized by the Naval Appropriation Act, Approved March 3, 1899 (p.17, S. Doc. No. 165, 56th Congress, 1st Session)". Google. U.S. Government Printing Office. February 10, 1900. Retrieved 2016-07-06.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anti-fouling paint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Anti-fouling paint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]