Talk:Antiquities

A fact from Antiquities appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Francis Bacon described antiquities as "remnants of history which have casually escaped the shipwreck of time"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/May.

Wikipedia

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

clumsy first sentence

I've tried to improve the first sentence but it has been reverted. The sentence has a few serious problems-

1 "nearly always used in the plural in this sense" is not true. "it is an antiquity" is normal usage (1.5 million results on google[1])
2 "in this sense" comes before anyone knows what the sense is. It is poor writing.
3 WP:REFERS The article is about antiquities, not "the term". Bhny (talk) 01:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal trading

This now retitled section was substandard and needed rewriting.

The Getty bronze youth had a poor reference and was misplaced under forgeries
There was no reference for the assertion about the kigano trade, which in any case is in forged antiques, not antiquities. A distinction between the two is made earlier in the article.
The assertion about ISOL's activities was an unsubstantiated piece of journalism mostly based on supposition. By itself it did not prove a link between such trading and terrorism as a whole, as claimed. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Antiquities. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140826120013/http://www.christies.com/departments/ant/overview.asp to http://www.christies.com/departments/ant/overview.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Antiquities. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Collectors of antiquities

Needed: a category for collectors of antiquities, as opposed to Category:Antiquarians. Should be a subcategory of Category:Collectors. Could conceivably be construed as a subcategory of Category:Art collectors. 07:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.117.23 (talk)